Are Three Guesses Better Than One?

Averaging your guesses is better than trying only once

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

The U.S. houses what percentage of the world’s airports? If you asked several people this question and averaged their guesses, you would probably end up closer to the right answer (30.5 percent) than if you asked just one person. This “wisdom of the crowd” effect has long been recognized, but scientists have recently gone a step further by showing that the strategy works even when the “crowd” consists of only one person.

Psychologists Edward Vul of the Massachusetts Institute of Tech­nol­ogy and Harold Pashler of the Uni­versity of California, San Diego, asked 428 participants various trivia ques­tions and then, without warning, asked them to guess again later. On average, a person’s combined responses were more accurate than either of his or her guesses alone, the authors reported in Psychological Science in July.

The findings support the notion that cognition may be described as statistical inference, meaning that people base their thoughts and judgments about the world on statistical probabilities, Vul says. When trying to answer a trivia question, people construct a range of possible values based on their knowledge. Each guess then represents one sample from that distribution, he says. For example, people might approach the question about the percentage of airports by imagining a world map showing the distribution of airports, Vul explains, “but because their knowledge is probabilistic the map they construct will be different for each guess.”


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Note: This story was originally printed with the title, "Go Ahead, Change Your Mind".

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe