Deaths of Young Children Are Decreasing Globally, But ...

Progress in improving mortality varies significantly within countries

Mapping Specialists (maps) and Amanda Montañez (graphs).

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Actions taken in response to goals set by the United Nations have reduced the deaths of children younger than five from 93 per 1,000 live births in 1990 to 39 in 2018. Low- and middle-income countries, which generally have higher under-5 mortality rates (U5MR) than their richer counterparts, have achieved some of the largest decreases. A recent paper in Nature suggests there is more to the story, however. Researchers who studied local U5MR rates in districts, counties, states and provinces within 99 low- and middle-income nations from 2000 to 2017 found great variability within many countries—especially those with particularly high or low rates overall. In some cases, though, subnational gaps have narrowed substantially. One important insight: in some countries, the ratio of infant (younger than one) deaths to under-5 deaths has risen, suggesting that preventing fatalities among the youngest children may be tougher to attain.

Credit: Mapping Specialists (maps) and Amanda Montañez (graphs); Source: “Mapping 123 Million Neonatal, Infant and Child Deaths between 2000 and 2017,” by Roy Burstein et al., in Nature, Vol. 574; October 17, 2019

Amanda Montañez is senior graphics editor and been at Scientific American since 2015. She produces and art directs information graphics for the Scientific American website and print magazine. Montañez has a bachelor's degree in studio art from Smith College and a master's in biomedical communications from the University of Toronto. Before starting in journalism, she worked as a freelance medical illustrator. Follow her on Bluesky @unamandita.bsky.social

More by Amanda Montañez
Scientific American Magazine Vol 322 Issue 4This article was published with the title “Survival of the Youngest” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 322 No. 4 (), p. 70
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0420-70

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe