Bug vs. bug: How do mosquitoes survive deadly viruses unscathed?

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American



On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Why can mosquitoes carry deadly viruses without succumbing to them and live on to give humans West Nile, dengue fever, and a host of other fatal illnesses. According to new research, the insects' primitive immune systems recognize that the viruses are dangerous and slice the microbes' genetic material into harmless pieces.

But while fighting the viruses, mosquitoes pass them to people (and in some cases other animals), who do not seem to have the capacity to chop them up. The finding, which was published in today's Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, could lead to therapies to beef up human immunity against such microbes or ways to remove mosquitoes' defenses so that they kick the bucket when invaded by viruses instead of surviving to spread them far and wide.

The prevailing theory had been that these viruses and mosquitoes lived in harmony. But entomologists found quite the opposite to be true. "We were shocked," lead author Kevin Myles told ScientificAmerican.com, "This had long been viewed as a very benign relationship."

Myles and his colleagues at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in Blacksburg, Va., discovered the mosquito's secret when they infected the insects with a virus that is a close relative of disease-causing microbes. They found that the mosquito's immune system cut up the virus' genetic material so that the insect didn't get ill. The team then infected the mosquitoes with a genetically modified virus that blocked their chopping mechanism. Those mosquitoes were unable to mount an attack against the invader and died off two to five times more quickly than did mosquitoes infected with the normal virus.

Understanding how mosquitoes fend off viral attacks might improve human health in the future, says study co-author Zach Adelman.

"If you could genetically modify a mosquito, then the mosquito would die upon becoming infected," he says. "This work hints that that's a possible application." He adds that future antiviral therapies for people may be fashioned to mimic the mosquito's virus-killing tricks. "If we could understand how the mosquito is doing such a good job," he says "maybe we could learn something about how to treat this disease in humans."

(Malaria is a parasite, not a virus, and so it's unclear whether these techniques would work for this particular mosquito-borne disease.)

(Image courtesy of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control.)

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe