Search Engine Plants Trees as It Finds Your Info

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Some people prefer Google when exploring the Web. Some like Yahoo or Bing. But now more than 2.5 million people a month are using Ecosia, because every time they click “Search” they help plant a tree.

Ecosia donates an impressive 80 percent of its income, after expenses, to programs that sows trees in Africa. The money, up to $75,000 a month (most of it from ads), is responsible for four new trees every minute, according to Ecosia spokesperson Jacey Bingler. That’s up from one tree a minute just two years ago, when I first wrote about the Ecosia.org site, which went live in 2009.

The group, based in Germany, had been funding a tree program in Brazil but last October it began financing WeForest’s reforestation project in Burkina Faso, West Africa. It is part of a larger effort to spread greenery across dry regions of Africa. Bingler noted by email that the project has a larger purpose, too. “It's about reviving drought-ravaged landscapes, nurturing, educating and empowering people, slowing the spread of disease and even reducing the likelihood of extremism and violent conflict.”


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Ecosia’s goal is to sprout 1 billion trees by 2020. Originally it hoped to reach that level by this year, but planting costs were high and users did not quickly flock to the search engine. That is all picking up steam today. “We celebrated our first million trees in November 2014, the second million already in May 2015,” Bingler noted. And the cost in Burkina Faso works out to about 30 cents a tree, instead of the dollar being spent before.

Bingler noted that the search engine continues to improve; searches are now 34 percent faster than they were last year. It is powered primarily by Bing and is enhanced with Ecosia’s own algorithms and technologies. Users can also click a “Google” button, which gives that engine’s results for the same inquiry. Bingler added that Ecosia is an important alternative to the big players “because it empowers users to do good without spending a penny. Highly abstract everyday tasks, like searching the Web, can lead to something as tangible as a new tree.”

Mark Fischetti was a senior editor at Scientific American for nearly 20 years and covered sustainability issues, including climate, environment, energy, and more. He assigned and edited feature articles and news by journalists and scientists and also wrote in those formats. He was founding managing editor of two spin-off magazines: Scientific American Mind and Scientific American Earth 3.0. His 2001 article “Drowning New Orleans” predicted the widespread disaster that a storm like Hurricane Katrina would impose on the city. Fischetti has written as a freelancer for the New York Times, Sports Illustrated, Smithsonian and many other outlets. He co-authored the book Weaving the Web with Tim Berners-Lee, inventor of the World Wide Web, which tells the real story of how the Web was created. He also co-authored The New Killer Diseases with microbiologist Elinor Levy. Fischetti has a physics degree and has twice served as Attaway Fellow in Civic Culture at Centenary College of Louisiana, which awarded him an honorary doctorate. In 2021 he received the American Geophysical Union’s Robert C. Cowen Award for Sustained Achievement in Science Journalism. He has appeared on NBC’s Meet the Press, CNN, the History Channel, NPR News and many radio stations.

More by Mark Fischetti

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe