A Visual Guide to Genetic Modification

Infographic compares CRISPR technology to other GM methods used in crops

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


In this month’s issue of Scientific American, Stephen S. Hall tells the story of how the revolutionary gene-editing tool known as CRISPR could transform the agricultural industry. Using mushrooms as his primary example, Hall paints a cautiously optimistic picture of how this particular mode of genetic modification could benefit small farmers, as opposed to the multinational corporations typically associated with GMOs. Given the widespread skepticism toward GM products, the challenge will be to dispel public notions of CRISPR as a more advanced, and thus potentially scarier, form of genetic engineering.

Using the principles of genetics to alter crops is not new, of course—in fact, it goes back to Gregor Mendel and his famous crossbred peas. There exists a general understanding that what we now know as GMOs—genetically modified organisms—are different from what Mendel created. But how, exactly, are they different, and why does the distinction matter? Moreover, what sets CRISPR apart from other GM technologies?

Fortunately, there’s an infographic to answer all of these questions. The graphic below, created by Jen Christiansen as part of the March print feature “Editing the Mushroom,” provides an elegant explanation of three main categories of genetic modification. Using consistent, tangible examples and an accessible visual language, this graphic demystifies GM technology and underscores CRISPR’s potential as a more precise, and in fact less disruptive way to improve crops than science has ever offered before.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Graphic by Jen Christiansen

Amanda Montañez is senior graphics editor and been at Scientific American since 2015. She produces and art directs information graphics for the Scientific American website and print magazine. Montañez has a bachelor's degree in studio art from Smith College and a master's in biomedical communications from the University of Toronto. Before starting in journalism, she worked as a freelance medical illustrator. Follow her on Bluesky @unamandita.bsky.social

More by Amanda Montañez

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe