Super Bowl Sunday's Food Needs Work

A public health advocate determined how much exercise is required to burn off various typical big game foods.

Getty Images/iStockphoto Thinkstock Images (MARS)

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

It’s nearly game day and, if you’re a fan, you’ve already set aside your roomiest sweatpants and your own personal Family-size bag of Nacho Cheese Doritos. But if you’re at all concerned about overindulging—which, if you live in America, you probably should be—you might take a tip from a public health advocate at the New York City Food Policy Center. Charles Platkin says that one way to avoid overdoing it is to consider how much you’d have to exercise to work off what you consume.

So to prepare for Super Bowl Sunday—the second biggest day for food consumption in the U.S.—Platkin crunched the numbers for some of our favorite couch-side snacks. And he’s helpfully converted them into football-themed exercise equivalents.

So, for example, two slices of Domino’s ultimate pepperoni hand-tossed crust pizza would require running nearly 11,000 yards—that’s 109 football fields—at a speed of five miles per hour.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Two KFC original drumsticks? Just do the wave 1,561 times.

To pay for a single potato chip loaded with French onion dip you’d have to sing along with Coldplay and Beyonce for 30 minutes during halftime.

And even five pretzels—yes, puny little pretzels out of a bag—would take six-and-a-half minutes of jumping up and down whenever your team scores a touchdown.

Which means that if you want to avoid post-bowl paunch, your team better bring it. Either that or just stick with the celery sticks. And pass on the dip, if you want to maintain the current size of your end zone.

—Karen Hopkin

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe