U.S. Flu Spread Counts On Southern Cold Snaps

A multifactorial analysis finds that the ignition of a flu epidemic stems from a blast of colder weather striking an otherwise warm, humid, urban environment, and driving people indoors into close quarters.

 

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

If you’ve got the flu, your focus is on getting better—not on how you caught it. But from a public health standpoint, tracking how flu spreads can help keep the virus contained.

In the past, models predicting the path of epidemics have focused on travel by plane—in some cases combining data on population density with airport locations. And when studies showed that influenza transmission is modulated by humidity, scientists injected information on climate into the mix.

Now, a new study combines data on a variety of factors, from doctors’ visits and vaccination coverage to weather patterns and the movement of individuals as recorded by Twitter. The finding: in the U.S., influenza typically arises in the warm, humid conditions of the south and spreads quickly thanks to the high degree of social connectivity in the region. The finding is in the journal eLife. [Ishanu Chattopadhyay et al., Conjunction of factors triggering waves of seasonal influenza]


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The researchers started by poring over health care records from more than 40 million families, looking for reports of flulike symptoms. The analysis covered nine season’s worth of data, from 2003 to 2011. And it pointed toward outbreaks starting near the Gulf of Mexico or the southern Atlantic, a surge that seemed to coincide with the southward migration of ducks.

“We did our first analysis and it did look like ducks could be possible carriers of the virus, starting spark of the influenza epidemic.”

Andrey Rzhetsky of the University of Chicago, the study’s senior author. He says they wrote up their “duck hypothesis” and submitted the paper for review.

“Reviewers, so to speak, strongly encouraged us to include additional factors into the model, specifically climate variables, temperature, wind speeds, solar radiation, humidity.”

And when they did…

“Lo and behold, duck hypothesis collapsed. Ducks as predictor were not important anymore and climate took the first place.”

Based on the data they collected, the researchers liken the spread of flu to a wildfire. The spark that ignites the epidemic is provided when a blast of colder weather strikes an otherwise warm, humid, urban environment. That chill allows the virus to remain viable in water droplets and perhaps forces people indoors into close quarters.

That’s where Southern hospitality comes in. Folks in the south are more highly socially connected than elsewhere in the country. So friends, neighbors and community members have plenty of opportunity to pass the virus to one another face to face.

Finally, driving from county to county or traveling by plane, allows the flu to spread like wind carries a fire. So ya’ll come back now—but first make sure you’re no longer contagious.

—Karen Hopkin

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe