New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

An Issue for Everyone

Gail Orenstein Getty Images

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Women have too long been an afterthought: denied equal opportunity at home and in society and ignored by science. Recent decades brought progress toward some measure of parity in the realms of economics, politics, education and health care, but yawning gaps remain, and some are growing, threatening to undermine everyone's well-being. As the World Economic Forum put it in its 2018 report on gender disparities, “More than ever, societies cannot afford to lose out on the skills, ideas and perspectives of half of humanity to realize the promise of a more prosperous and human-centric future that well-governed innovation and technology can bring.”

New research is resolving age-old and often misguided debates about the dissimilarities between the genders. Rather than inherent biological characteristics, environmental factors are coming to be seen as the driving force behind both behavioral and brain differences between men and women, though in some cases amid controversy. Gender variances certainly do impact the health of women: they experience higher risk for depression and Alzheimer's disease and are more susceptible to lesser-known versions of heart disease than men are.

Nowhere are women being more underserved by the biological sciences, perhaps, than in the field of reproductive medicine. Most scientists agree that a dearth of research is harming women's health. After more than 60 years of mass-scale reliance on birth control (which has led to crucial social outcomes for women), investigators are just now considering its physical consequences and asking if better options are possible.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


In society and the workplace, women have long suffered the tradition of favoritism toward boys (and violence toward girls) and prejudice against their abilities. Thankfully, many attitudes are evolving, and for the better—overall bias against certain groups has declined in recent years. Adjusting workplace policies can have a drastic effect on retaining and empowering women employees, such as training personnel to change perspectives that prevent the advancement of women and rooting out sexual misconduct. Culture shifts take time, but the payoff is measurable in dollars to the economy and improvements in building the modern world.

The World Economic Forum report made note of a concerning emergence of a gender gap in AI-related skill sets, and surely all sectors of innovation cannot afford to waste the talents of women. Dollars and science aside, there is a more basic reason to care: justice and equality for all.

Andrea Gawrylewski is chief newsletter editor at Scientific American. She writes the daily Today in Science newsletter and oversees all other newsletters at the magazine. In addition, she manages all special editions and in the past was the editor for Scientific American Mind, Scientific American Space & Physics and Scientific American Health & Medicine. Gawrylewski got her start in journalism at the Scientist magazine, where she was a features writer and editor for "hot" research papers in the life sciences. She spent more than six years in educational publishing, editing books for higher education in biology, environmental science and nutrition. She holds a master's degree in earth science and a master's degree in journalism, both from Columbia University, home of the Pulitzer Prize.

More by Andrea Gawrylewski
SA Special Editions Vol 29 Issue 1This article was published with the title “An Issue for Everyone” in SA Special Editions Vol. 29 No. 1 (), p. 1
doi:10.1038/scientificamericanwomen0120-1

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe