Jellyfish and sea anemones sleep just like us

Sea anemones and jellyfish don’t have brains, but the way their neurons behave during sleep shows some surprising similarities to humans

Cannonball jelly (Stomolophus meleagris) agregation

Jellyfish like this one have neurons across their bodies that let them enter a sleeplike state.

Humberto Ramirez/Getty Images

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Jellyfish and sea anemones are curious creatures: these organisms evolved without a brain and, as scientists discovered in the past several years, don’t need one to sleep. The animals do, however, have neurons—nerve cells that appear interconnected throughout their body. A new study shows that how these animals sleep is surprisingly similar to the way humans do, suggesting that humanlike sleep might have evolved before even the most primitive brains.

The findings, published in Nature Communications, also shed light on one of science’s prevailing mysteries: Why do animals sleep? They add to past evidence from other animals and humans that sleep provides a “window” of downtime for maintenance on the brain and body, helping to repair DNA damage and maintain neuronal health.

“This confirms that sleep allows a window for key housekeeping tasks,” says Philippe Mourrain, an associate professor of psychiatry and behavioral sciences at Stanford University who studies sleep and was not involved in the new study.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The work shows this function of sleep has been conserved across evolution, Mourrain says, from animals with some of the most complex brains, such as primates, to animals that have none, such as jellyfish and other cnidarians.

The researchers studied one jellyfish and one sea anemone species, finding that the jellyfish appears to enter a sleeplike state for around eight hours a day and generally at night—a schedule many humans might recognize. The sea anemone analyzed also appears to shut down for around a third of the day.

The study animals slept more when the researchers damaged their neurons, a finding that Mourrain says gives clues to what makes us fall asleep in the first place.

Claire Cameron is breaking news chief at Scientific American. Originally from Scotland, she moved to New York City in 2012. Her work has appeared in National Geographic, Slate, Inc. Magazine, Nautilus, Semafor, and elsewhere.

More by Claire Cameron
Scientific American Magazine Vol 334 Issue 4This article was published with the title “Mindless Sleep” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 334 No. 4 (), p. 14
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican042026-2y1g2VQLrxvPPoFsIdYrek

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe