New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Jewel Beetles’ Iridescent Shells Deter Hungry Birds—By Freaking Them Out

Weirdly shifting colors may serve dual evolutionary purposes, providing both camouflage and conspicuous warning

Jewel beetle on bark.

Jewel beetle.

Karin Kjernsmo

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Flashy iridescent shells might not seem like the best evolutionary strategy for bugs trying to avoid hungry birds. But in recent years, biologists have shown that iridescence—lustrous shifts in color, depending on the angle of view—can actually camouflage green jewel beetles among sun-dappled leaves. Now a new study published in Animal Behavior suggests iridescence also works another way to protect these insects, even when they step into plain sight: birds appear to have an innate wariness of the color changes themselves.

The study authors say this is the first time iridescence, as opposed to simple glossiness or bright colors, has been shown to deter predators. “It’s actually the changeability, the very hallmark of iridescence, that is important for this protective function,” says Karin Kjernsmo, a researcher at the University of Bristol in England and the study’s lead author.

To test how birds reacted to iridescent beetles’ varying colors, Kjernsmo and her colleagues set out gloss, color-shifting Sternocera aequisignata jewel beetle shells, along artificial glossy and matte green shells and a color-shifting shell with matte varnish. They baited the shells with mealworms, then offered this buffet to day-old domestic chicks (this was to ensure any reactions were innate, not the product of learned predation tactics).


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Iridescent green shell of a jewel bettle of the species Sternocera aequisignata and three artificial shells used to test how chicks would respond to iridescence.

Credit: Karin Kjernsmo

The chicks scarfed down the mealworms under the matte green shells, but they hesitated when encountering glossy shells and both color-changing types. A 2017 paper from another lab had shown that birds shy away from glossiness, yet the specific avoidance of the color-shifting colors was not previously documented, the researchers said.

Johanna Mappes, a University of Helsinki biologist who worked on the 2017 study but was not involved with the new paper, praises the way Kjernsmo’s team controlled for each type of shell finish, “especially creating matte iridescence signals—it’s really genius.”

The new findings suggest iridescence is an evolutionary two-for-one deal: it helps the jewel beetles hide, but it also scares off predators that manage to spot them. Kjernsmo speculates that this might help explain why so many insects are iridescent: it “allows them to be protected in many different contexts.”

This hypothesis might also explain why these jewel beetles evolved to use iridescence rather than a more typical warning color such as bright red or orange. While some poisonous insects, such as ladybugs and monarch butterflies, use these vivid hues to advise birds to back off, such colors also stand out more. These insects’ poison provides a backup in case they do get noticed. For this species of jewel beetle, which does not have chemical defenses, the extra attention from a traditional warning color might not be worth it—better to blend in when possible.

More research is needed to discern why iridescence seems to frighten birds. These jewel beetles may be mimicking other iridescent insects that do have chemical defenses. Kjernsmo says this idea might be confirmed by analyzing the insect family tree to see how often iridescence coincides with poison. Alternatively, Mappes posits, iridescence might simply confuse predators: if a beetle’s color shifts, a predator might not be able to classify it as safe or dangerous.

Baby chick reacts to the different shell finishes—avoiding the iridescent ones—when tempted by mealworms placed underneath them.

Credit: Karin Kjernsmo

Though more work is needed to fully understand iridescence as a warning, Kjernsmo says she is proud of how this study demonstrates nature’s nuance and complexity. It can be tempting to find one answer and stop looking, she says, but “it’s really important to realize that colors can actually serve multiple purposes at the same time—that they don’t necessarily evolve for one particular purpose.”

A version of this article with the title “Dazzling Defenses” was adapted for inclusion in the August 2022 issue of Scientific American.

Kate Golembiewski is a science writer based in Chicago. Her work has appeared in the New York Times, the Atlantic, Discover, National Geographic's Voices blog and Atlas Obscura. Follow Golembiewski on Twitter @kategscience

More by Kate Golembiewski
Scientific American Magazine Vol 327 Issue 2This article was published with the title “Dazzling Defenses” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 327 No. 2 (), p. 15
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0822-15a

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe