New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

See How the Wildfire Smoke Spread Across the U.S.

Most of the eastern U.S. has been swathed in smoke billowing off more than 400 wildfires across Canada

Map overlaid with swathes of color indicates large areas of smoke over North America.

Ripley Cleghorn

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Much of the eastern U.S. has seen unsettlingly hazy skies this week as smoke from the more than 400 wildfires currently blazing across Canada has blown south.

Wednesday was by far the worst day for wildfire smoke in the contiguous U.S. since 2006, according to researchers at Stanford University’s Environmental Change and Human Outcomes Lab, and Tuesday claimed the number four slot. Scientists are still waiting to see how Thursday compares.

Although wildfire smoke is a common hazard in the western U.S., it’s rare on the East Coast. Millions of people in newly affected region scrambled to understand the official Air Quality Index, which quantifies just how dangerous the air is, and to protect themselves from the acrid smoke particles.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


To visualize the spread of smoke, consider this map, which shows data from Wednesday. One particularly concentrated plume of smoke arcs southward from fires burning in and around Quebec, covers the Great Lakes and then sweeps over New York City and out above the Atlantic Ocean.

But while the worst conditions are in the eastern U.S., lower concentrations of smoke coat much of the nation, as well as nearly all of Canada and a portion of Central America. Even states as far from the fires as Tennessee saw serious amounts of smoke in the atmosphere.

The map is based on smoke detected in photographs taken by the satellites GOES-East and GOES-West, which are both operated by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.

Meghan Bartels is a science journalist based in New York City. She was previously a senior reporter at Scientific American. Before that she spent more than four years as a writer and editor at Space.com, as well as nearly a year as a science reporter at Newsweek, where she focused on space and Earth science. Her writing has also appeared in Audubon, Nautilus, Astronomy and Smithsonian, among other publications. She attended Georgetown University and earned a master’s degree in journalism at New York University’s Science, Health and Environmental Reporting Program.

More by Meghan Bartels

Ripley Cleghorn is a science communicator and data visualization designer. She is Scientific American’s current graphics intern.

More by Ripley Cleghorn

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe