New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

13 Workers Test Positive for Radiation at New Mexico Waste Site

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

By Laura Zuckerman

(Reuters) - Thirteen workers have tested positive for radiation exposure tied to an accidental release earlier this month of high levels of radiation in an underground nuclear waste repository in New Mexico, the U.S. Department of Energy said on Wednesday.

No workers were underground at the Waste Isolation Pilot Project in southeastern New Mexico when air sensors half a mile below surface in an ancient salt formation triggered an alarm on February 14 indicating excessive amounts of radioactive particles.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The plant is a repository for so-called transuranic waste shipped from federal nuclear laboratories and weapons sites. The waste includes discarded machinery, clothing and other items contaminated with plutonium or other radioisotopes heavier than uranium.

Particles emitted from the decay of those radioactive elements can harm humans if inhaled or ingested.

Managers of the government site near Carlsbad initially said that none of the 139 employees working above ground when the release happened were exposed to radioactive contaminants based on external testing of their skin and clothing.

But analyses released on Wednesday of biological samples lifted from the workers showed that 13 of them were in fact exposed to radioactive particles, Joe Franco, manager of the U.S. Energy Department field office that oversees the plant, said in a statement.

"It is premature to speculate on the health effects of these preliminary results or any treatment that may be needed," he said. He did not give details on the level of contamination detected in the biological samples.

Franco added that continued sampling and monitoring at the site indicated that contamination of surface air in and around the facility was likely at very low levels and not a threat to humans or the environment.

(Editing by Cynthia Johnston and Lisa Shumaker)

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe