New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

2025 Likely to Tie for Second-Hottest Year on Record

Europe’s climate agency said 2025 is likely to be the second or third hottest on record

Cropped image of a bar chart shows temperature anomalies over time and highlights the 2025 value of +1.48 degrees Celsius.

Amanda Montañez; Source: Copernicus Climate Change Service (data)

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This year may be the second-hottest year on record, likely tying for silver with 2023. Europe’s climate agency on Monday reported that 2025 is slightly less scorching than 2024—which was the first year to exceed 1.5 degrees Celsius above preindustrial levels.

The European Union’s Copernicus Climate Change Service (C3S) reported data up to November 2025 that show this year has been 1.48 degrees C above the average from 1850 to 1900. That’s right around the target set by the 2015 Paris climate agreement, under which countries pledged to limit warming to below 1.5 degrees C and “well below” 2 degrees C. Despite 2024’s record-setting temperatures and 2025’s proximity to the 1.5-degrees-C threshold, scientists must take into account many years of data before they can say with certainty that the Paris Agreement’s target has been breached.

Bar chart shows annual global temperature anomalies from 1940 to 2025 compared with the preindustrial period.

Amanda Montañez; Source: Copernicus Climate Change Service (data)


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Still, trends are heading that way. “The three-year average for 2023–2025 is on track to exceed 1.5°C for the first time,” Samantha Burgess, C3S’s strategic lead for climate, said in a statement. “These milestones are not abstract—they reflect the accelerating pace of climate change and the only way to mitigate future rising temperatures is to rapidly reduce greenhouse gas emissions.”

Record heat has become far more likely than record cold. Each of the world’s 10 hottest years have occurred within the last decade. The new temperature report comes just weeks after this year’s United Nations meeting to uphold the Paris Agreement ended with countries avoiding mention of fossil fuels, disappointing climate scientists and advocates who had hoped for stronger pledges to bring down planet-warming emissions.

That 2025 was so hot is particularly worrisome because this was a La Niña year. The opposite of an El Niño climate pattern, La Niña typically cools Pacific Ocean waters and leads to slightly colder global temperatures. But this year’s La Niña was weak and short-lived. Indeed, La Niña years are becoming hotter than some past El Niño years. Thanks to El Niño, 2016 was the hottest year on record at the time, but compared with 2025, “2016 is now looking decidedly cool,” said Adam Scaife of the U.K.’s Met Office in a news release issued by the agency last December.

Andrea Thompson is senior editor for Earth and environment at Scientific American, covering the environment, energy and Earth sciences. She has been covering these topics for nearly two decades. Prior to joining Scientific American, she was a senior writer covering climate science at Climate Central and a reporter and editor at Live Science, where she primarily covered earth science and the environment. She has moderated panels, including as part of the United Nations Sustainable Development Media Zone, and appeared in radio and television interviews on major networks. She holds a graduate degree in science, health and environmental reporting from New York University, as well as a B.S. and an M.S. in atmospheric chemistry from the Georgia Institute of Technology. Follow Thompson on Bluesky @andreatweather.bsky.social

More by Andrea Thompson

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe