New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

2026 FIFA World Cup players and fans at risk of extreme heat, climate scientists warn

Heat conditions could exceed dangerous levels at a quarter of the planned 2026 World Cup soccer matches, including the final in New Jersey on July 19

A general interior view of MetLife Stadium, host venue for the FIFA World Cup 2026.

Robbie Jay Barratt–AMA/Getty Images

Soccer fans planning to attend the 2026 FIFA World Cup, prepare to sweat. A quarter of the games are likely to be played under heat conditions that pose a threat to both fans and players, according to a new analysis by the climate modeling organization World Weather Attribution (WWA).

At a press briefing on Wednesday, scientists called on officials in the World Cup’s 16 host cities in the U.S., Canada and Mexico to invest in hydration stations and cooling infrastructure to prevent heat-related injuries at the upcoming games. The predictions are based on a statistical model that included several variables, including historic weather data and the time of day the tournament’s 104 matches are set to take place. The model was used to determine the chances that each match would experience dangerous heat conditions.

The researchers focused on the wet bulb globe temperature (WBGT) system, which measures how heat is actually affecting the body by factoring in both air temperature and the effects of evaporative cooling, radiant heat and wind. It’s a more accurate way of forecasting risk, because air temperature alone doesn’t reflect heat conditions, said Chris Mullington, a senior lecturer at Imperial College London, who contributed to the analysis, at the press conference.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


“A [30-degree-Celsius] day in dry, breezy condition is very different from a [30-degree-C] day with high humidity, strong sun and little wind,” he said.

The International Federation of Professional Footballers’ Associations (FIFPRO) has set a 26-degree-Celsius WBGT as the threshold at which cooling and other heat-related safety measures should be implemented. One in four scheduled matches are likely to be played while there is a WBGT of 26 degrees C or higher, the analysis found. Five games could be played when the WBGT is at or above 28 degrees C, a level of heat stress at which FIFPRO advises matches be postponed.

Six open-air matches in Miami have a “near certain” level of certainty of exceeding a WBGT of 26 degrees C, according to the study. Of those, on July 11 and July 18, there’s a one-in-33 chance that the WBGT will exceed the 28-degree-C threshold.

While the study noted that several cities with the highest temperatures, such as Dallas and Houston, have air conditioning in their stadiums, others don’t have proper cooling in place. The three highest-risk venues are in Miami, Kansas City and East Rutherford, N.J., which is where the final will take place on July 19. The analysis predicts a one-in-eight chance of 26-degree-C WBGT conditions and a one-in-37 chance of a 28-degree-C WBGT on that date.

This is not the first time scientists have warned that the tournament is at risk of extreme heat. A 2025 study in the International Journal of Biometeorology warned that four host cities exceed the 28-degree-C threshold more than half the time during the summer. And the last World Cup, held in Qatar in 2022, was moved from summer to winter because of the danger posed by extreme temperatures.

Mullington warned that the heat could affect the players’ performance and pose a threat to their health. He called on organizers to adopt precautionary measures during matches, such as heat breaks, shaded areas, ice towels, cold fluids, altered warm-up schedules and increased medical monitoring during matches played in hotter conditions.

Fans are also at risk, whether in stadiums or at planned outdoor events connected to the World Cup.

“Spectators are ... more medically diverse, may be older or very young, may have cardiovascular disease, kidney or metabolic disease,” he said. They also have additional heat exposure while traveling to the matches. Organizers should ensure they have sufficient medical staffing, on-site access to water and shade and transport planning to deal with the threat, he added.

The U.S. last hosted the World Cup in 1994, when temperatures in the host cities were an average of 0.7 degree C cooler than they are today—a result of climate change, the researchers say.

“Our findings show conditions associated with these physiological heat-stress conditions have now become more likely and more intense than during the previous World Cup,” said Joyce Kimutai, a research associate in extreme weather and climate change at London’s Imperial College, at the same press conference. “These changes are confidently attributable to anthropogenic climate change.”

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe