New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

A Gene for Aging Smartly

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


If you live to 100, as roughly one in every 10,000 people do, you will want both your mind and body intact. A certain gene seems to help accomplish just that. Nir Barzilai of the Albert Einstein College of Medicine and his colleagues examined 158 elderly people of Ashkenazi Jewish descent. Centenarians who passed a 30-question test were two to three times as likely to have a common variant of the so-called CETP gene as those who did not. Those between 75 and 85 who passed the test were five times as likely. The CETP gene variant leads to larger than normal cholesterol particles in the blood, their size perhaps making them less likely to lodge in the lining of blood vessels, a process that boosts the risk of heart attack and stroke. The findings appear in the December 26 Neurology.

Charles Q. Choi is a frequent contributor to Scientific American. His work has also appeared in The New York Times, Science, Nature, Wired, and LiveScience, among others. In his spare time, he has traveled to all seven continents.

More by Charles Q. Choi
Scientific American Magazine Vol 296 Issue 3This article was published with the title “A Gene for Aging Smartly” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 296 No. 3 (), p. 30
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0307-30Bd

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe