New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

A SpaceX rocket is about to hit the moon—these videos show what could happen

Astronomers’ simulations predict what this lunar impact—and its aftermath—will look like

Computational Fluid Physics Lab/University of Texas at Austin

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Updated August 6, 2026 at 8:00 AM

Editor’s Note (8/6/26): The SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket upper stage discussed in this article struck the moon at about 2:35 a.m. Eastern time on Wednesday, August 5. Onlookers reported no immediate visual evidence of the event, but subsequent observations spied a plume of ejected material as well as a crater at the impact site.

An errant piece of a SpaceX rocket is on a collision course with the moon, and astronomers are eagerly awaiting the chance to observe the impact in real time. New simulations from a team at the University of Texas at Austin offer a glimpse of exactly what scientists might see when the crash occurs.

The object is the upper stage of a Falcon 9 rocket that launched in January 2025 to deliver two lunar landers—Firefly Aerospace’s Blue Ghost and Japanese company ispace’s Resilience, which was part of the HAKUTO-R Program. After the lunar delivery, the upper stage was supposed to fall back to Earth and burn up in the atmosphere. Instead the object, which is about the height of a five-story building, went AWOL: the rocket entered into orbit around Earth at a similar distance as the moon, setting up an eventual collision with our natural satellite.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Amateur astronomer Bill Gray, who first observed the stray rocket, has predicted that the crash will occur at around 2:35 A.M. EDT. on Wednesday. The impact is likely to hit close to the Einstein Crater, according to Gray. Because it will appear on the very edge of the sunlit side of the moon, as seen from our planet, Earthlings might get a glimpse of some of the ejecta plume—the cloud of dust and debris that the collision will create. The more than 8,800-pound piece of space junk will hit the moon at around 5,400 miles per hour and with similar energy to three tons of TNT.

The new simulations from UT Austin’s Computational Fluid Physics Lab preview what the collision might look like when it happens.

A simulation of a rocket impacting the surface of the moon.

A simulation of a rocket impacting the surface of the moon.

Computational Fluid Physics Lab/University of Texas at Austin

Gray warned in a recent blog post, however, that viewers will almost certainly not be able to see the actual collision. In a recent preprint paper co-authored by Gray, astronomers explained that detecting the impact flash will likely be challenging because of the probable crash location on the moon’s sunlit hemisphere. Indeed, no artificial or natural impact flashes have ever been seen on the lit surface of the moon, they wrote.

Instead scientists may be able to observe the aftermath. The plume of debris the spacecraft will create when it slams into the lunar surface could take minutes after the crash to rise far enough to become visible from the moon’s limb (its outer, visible edge), according to Gray.

This simulation gives an idea of what that might look like.

A simulation of a rocket impacting the surface of the moon shows the natural satellite’s outer edge, or limb.

This collision simulation shows the moon’s outer edge, or limb.

Computational Fluid Physics Lab/The University of Texas at Austin

This is not the first time a piece of space junk has hit the moon, and as more and more spacecraft launch into orbit and beyond, it is unlikely to be the last. Tracking such errant bits and pieces of hardware is difficult, but as NASA and other space agencies gear up to establish permanently staffed lunar bases, doing so will take on more urgency.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe