New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

A toothless, beaked, bipedal crocodile cousin roamed Earth 200 million years ago

Like modern crocodiles, this bizarre ancient reptile was likely a carnivore, but otherwise it bears little resemblance to them

Reconstruction of Labrujasuchus expectatus, a new species of Shuvosauridae from Late Triassic rocks of Ghost Ranch, New Mexico

Jorge Gonzalez; Copyright NHMLAC Dinosaur Institute

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

More than 200 million years ago a bizarre, beaked, toothless reptile with tiny arms stomped around on its hind legs in what’s now New Mexico. It may not have looked like it, but this newly identified creature was an ancient relative of a group of modern-day animals with a fearsome reputation—crocodiles.

The reptile’s remains were originally discovered in 2006 in a New Mexico quarry that is well known among paleontologists for its rich trove of Triassic-era fossils. The bones closely resemble those belonging to the two recognized North American species of Shuvosauridae, a clade of ancient bipedal reptiles that lived through the Late Triassic. But the new Shuvosauridae specimen appeared just slightly different, says Alan Turner, a professor of anatomical sciences at Stony Brook University and leader of the team that discovered the remains. First, the bones were dated to around 212 million years ago, which was more recent than one of the North American Shuvosauridae species and later than other. And there were subtle physiological differences, such as in its humerus. Turner and his colleagues outlined the findings in a study in Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology.

“We look at those fine details, because those are the things that the evolutionary processes are shaping, and that lets us get at their family tree that way,” he says.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Called Labrujasuchus expectatus, the new species belongs to a lineage that today includes crocodiles—but the relationship is a distant one. Importantly, L. expectatus, which has been given the nickname the “witch croc” becuse the area it was discovered in was previously known in Spanish as the Ranch of the Witches, is “definitely not direct ancestors to modern alligators and crocodiles,” Turner says. “You can think of them as like a very, very distant cousin. They split hundreds of millions of years ago from the group that eventually leads us to alligators and crocodiles. It’s sort of a side branch.”

Modern crocodiles are known for their rows of razor-sharp teeth, but L. expectatus didn't have any. Teeth or no teeth, it’s difficult to determine what its diet consisted of, Turner says. Birds also have a beak and no teeth, and that doesn’t stop an eagle from being a carnivore. And L. expectatus evolved so long ago that fruit didn’t really exist. While it’s not possible to say definitively, Turner believes the reptile was a meat eater and possibly a scavenger.

The new species helps fill in some more of our constantly expanding understanding of evolutionary history. L. expectatus was technically not a dinosaur, despite looking and likely having acted a lot like one, Turner points out. Learning more about it can further science’s understanding of convergent evolution, he says.

“That’s the thing I think I find the most interesting about an animal like L. expectatus,” Turner adds. “It’s one more data point that we have in furthering these models about that important evolutionary process.”

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe