New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

A volcanic mystery reveals that rising magma has a stealth mode

In 2022 a swarm of earthquakes in the Azores suggested that an eruption was imminent, but none happened. Now we know why, and it means magma can be sneakier than we knew

A hilly green landscape stretching into the distance

The valleys scoring through São Jorge Island's central spine are surface expressions of the fault the magma was sneaking up through.

Ricardo Ramalho

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

On March 19, 2022, São Jorge Island—a volcanic isle in Portugal’s Azores archipelago—started shaking. The thousands of tremors suggested that either an eruption or a major earthquake was imminent, and a precautionary evacuation plan was activated. But the seismic activity fizzled out and nothing else happened, leaving volcanologists and seismologists to puzzle over the episode.

A new study, published Thursday in Nature Communications, offers a disquieting explanation. Just prior to the explosion of seismic activity, a sheet of magma that could fill about 32,000 Olympic-size swimming pools had rocketed up from a depth of at least 12 miles to just a mile below São Jorge’s surface in no more than a day.

Unusually, this magma didn’t generate any large, rock-breaking quakes because it found a preexisting fault network that it could tunnel through. The seismic swarm only happened after the magma had almost reached the surface. If an eruption had taken place, people would have already been in harm’s way by the time the multitude of quakes had alerted the authorities.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


“This is a bit of a wake-up call that these things could happen really quickly, and perhaps more quietly, than we anticipated,” says Rebecca Williams, a volcanologist at the University of Hull in England, who wasn’t involved with the new study.

The Azores islands have twin volcanic engines: one is a rising fountain of superheated rock known as a mantle plume, and the other is the islands’ location atop three diverging tectonic plates, which allows hot rock to rise, decompress and melt. São Jorge last experienced a land eruption in 1808. It’s only a matter of time before another takes place, which is why the March 2022 rumbling put everyone on edge.

Figuring out what happened took several lines of evidence. A few days into the quaking, satellite and GPS data revealed that something else had already happened: the northern and southern edges of São Jorge had inflated, while two islands to either side of São Jorge had moved ever-so-slightly farther away from it.

This indicated that by the onset of the seismic crisis on March 19, a sheet of magma had already emplaced itself below São Jorge—but it hadn’t erupted. “It was a failed eruption,” says study co-author Pablo Gonzalez, a volcano geophysicist at the Spanish National Research Council.

Before the seismic swarm, there were only two seismometers on São Jorge. In the days to months after the swarm started, dozens of extra sensors were placed on the island, on the surrounding seafloor and on several nearby islands. By detecting more than 18,000 additional quakes, scientists were able to better understand what had occurred, and where, beneath São Jorge.

“The magma intrusion occurred almost instantly, in a matter of hours,” Gonzalez says. It moved from the upper mantle to the top of the crust, all without making any large quakes—but how?

It seems the magma was channeled through the Pico do Carvão fault system, a preexisting labyrinth that forms a visible trench on the island’s verdant surface. “A fault is full of more permeable materials and natural fractures,” says co-author Stephen Hicks, a seismologist at University College London. That meant the magma could easily, and stealthily, pry its way through the crust, rather than having to smash through solid rock.

The magma had significant upward momentum. “This could have made it all the way up,” Williams says. But it didn’t, partly because the magma eventually hit a rigid geologic barrier at the base of São Jorge and partly because when the magma stalled, its fluids and gases leaked out into fault cracks nearby, reducing its buoyancy and triggering thousands of modest quakes—the seismic swarm that got everyone’s attention.

In 2022 São Jorge got lucky. But this study shows how “magma can get so close to the surface and not have any visible effects,” Gonzalez says. It underscores that molten rock can sometimes be remarkably sneaky, confounding attempts to forecast when, and if, an eruption will happen.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe