New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Addicts Quit with Paid Work and Near-Daily Drug Tests

Therapeutic workplaces offer frequent cash paydays and bonuses in exchange for staying clean

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Drug addicts often have trouble holding down a job. Yet many experts believe that having a steady income is key to helping addicts quit. To that end, psychiatrist Kenneth Silverman of the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine and his colleagues created “therapeutic workplaces.” The technique features frequent drug tests, unlimited second chances and cash bonuses to addicts who keep clean. Research in recent years has suggested that Silverman has indeed homed in on a winning strategy.

In a therapeutic workplace, full-time employees agree to be tested at least three times a week to see if they are clean or becoming cleaner. If not, they are sent home—but they can return the next day to try again. If clean, they can work full-time for an hourly wage until the next drug test.

Paychecks come frequently, and cash bonuses are a constant possibility if workers meet drug- or job-related goals, such as staying clean for a certain period or performing, say, a data-entry task more proficiently. In early trials, researchers worried that giving addicts cash would tempt them to buy drugs, but results showed the opposite—workers who got cash bonuses stayed clean longer than those who simply drew their hourly wage.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The researchers' theories about therapeutic workplaces have now been validated in a series of randomized controlled trials using data-entry training regimens or jobs at a business that served the Johns Hopkins research community. Some trials enrolled cocaine users; others tested opiate addicts with medication-assisted treatment such as methadone or naltrexone. The studies consistently showed that around 80 percent of subjects in the therapeutic workplace regimen remained clean and refrained from other addictive behaviors, compared with 50 percent of the groups that worked without financial incentives.

A 2012 review of therapeutic workplaces concluded that this method is highly effective to ensure long-term abstinence, perhaps because it acknowledges the nuanced reality of addiction recovery—relapses are to be expected, but if sobriety continues to offer immediate rewards, addicts will move toward abstinence.

In 2014 the federal Office of National Drug Control Policy honored Silverman for his concept of therapeutic workplaces, although it has not widely spread throughout the addiction community. The intense monitoring required prevents most businesses from being able to embrace the model. Silverman has now teamed up with American Substance Abuse Professionals, the organization behind the “Drug-Free Workplace” campaign, to try to figure out how to bring this technique to the masses.

SA Mind Vol 26 Issue 2This article was published with the title “Cash for Quitting” in SA Mind Vol. 26 No. 2 (), p. 16
doi:10.1038/scientificamericanmind0315-16b

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe