Agricultural Machinery

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


As an instance of the improvement in agri culture now in progress, it may be mentioned' ' that the makers of steam engines for agricul-R tural purposes in England, have in some cases increased eight-fold within the last three fears. One house made in 1848 only 15 en gines, but in 1851 finished no less than 294. The same results hold good with respect to other improved agricultural implements.— One maker turns out 5 threshing machines a week; another who made only 56 machines in 1849 and 1850, turned out 192 in the last 21 months. A meeting ot the St. Andrews and Quebec Railway Co. was held at London on the 24th ] alt. The Directors' Report was regarded as satisfactory and adopted. A joint stock company has been formed to work the Middletown, Conn., silver mines. Its capital is $60,000. The mines are said to be very rich.

Scientific American Magazine Vol 8 Issue 29This article was published with the title “Agricultural Machinery” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 8 No. 29 (), p. 227
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican04021853-227c

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe