Alice Stanton

Building models of the human brain to better understand disease

Stylized illustration portrait of Alice Stanton by Jessine Hein.

Jessine Hein

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Alice Stanton’s friends call her a brain engineer. It’s an apt title for the scientist who developed the first complete tissue model of the human brain, with blood vessels and all six major cell types, including neurons and immune cells. She also has created a brain-on-a-chip, a version of her full-size model that’s smaller than a mustard seed. Stanton wants to use these mini brains to better understand neurological diseases such as Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s so researchers can develop personalized treatments for them.

Stanton grew up in Erie, Pa., exploring nature and biology by playing in the sand and collecting insects. When she was young, she watched her grandmother cope after a stroke. “I think that started my fascination with the brain and my desire to devote my life to coming up with as many new therapeutic possibilities as I could,” she says.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Portrait photograph of Alice Stanton by Tony Luong.

Tony Luong

Stanton built her brain model, called miBrain, at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, using techniques she had gleaned from working with stem cells earlier in her career. To model neurological diseases, she incorporated other types of cells, including immune cells called microglia; overactive microglia drive chronic inflammation, which is tied to Alzheimer’s. From this larger model, Stanton developed a miniature version—a brain-on-a-chip—that can be used to test therapeutics.

Organs-on-a-chip are emerging as tools of great potential in research and drug discovery. But the road to effective treatments is long and bumpy, and recent cuts to federal funding for science could threaten progress. Having stable support is incredibly important for momentum, Stanton says. “When we have a loved one who gets sick, we want a treatment—we want something to cure them,” she says. “It doesn’t come out of thin air.”

This article is part of The Young American Scientists, an editorially independent project that was produced with financial support from Regeneron.

Tanya Lewis is senior desk editor for health and medicine at Scientific American. She writes and edits stories for the website and print magazine on topics ranging from COVID to organ transplants. She also appears on Scientific American’s podcast Science Quickly and writes Scientific American’s weekly Health & Medicine newsletter. She has held a number of positions over her nine years at Scientific American, including health editor, assistant news editor and associate editor at Scientific American Mind. Previously, she has written for outlets that include Insider, Wired, Science News and others. She has a degree in biomedical engineering from Brown University and one in science communication from the University of California, Santa Cruz. Follow her on Bluesky @tanyalewis.bsky.social

More by Tanya Lewis
Scientific American Magazine Vol 335 Issue 1This article was published with the title “Alice Stanton” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 335 No. 1 (), p. 56
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican072026-5dAxHPDgyJjKpGv2oo7ZFy

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe