New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Alice Stanton

Building models of the human brain to better understand disease

Stylized illustration portrait of Alice Stanton by Jessine Hein.

Jessine Hein

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Alice Stanton’s friends call her a brain engineer. It’s an apt title for the scientist who developed the first complete tissue model of the human brain, with blood vessels and all six major cell types, including neurons and immune cells. She also has created a brain-on-a-chip, a version of her full-size model that’s smaller than a mustard seed. Stanton wants to use these mini brains to better understand neurological diseases such as Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s so researchers can develop personalized treatments for them.

Stanton grew up in Erie, Pa., exploring nature and biology by playing in the sand and collecting insects. When she was young, she watched her grandmother cope after a stroke. “I think that started my fascination with the brain and my desire to devote my life to coming up with as many new therapeutic possibilities as I could,” she says.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Portrait photograph of Alice Stanton by Tony Luong.

Tony Luong

Stanton built her brain model, called miBrain, at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, using techniques she had gleaned from working with stem cells earlier in her career. To model neurological diseases, she incorporated other types of cells, including immune cells called microglia; overactive microglia drive chronic inflammation, which is tied to Alzheimer’s. From this larger model, Stanton developed a miniature version—a brain-on-a-chip—that can be used to test therapeutics.

Organs-on-a-chip are emerging as tools of great potential in research and drug discovery. But the road to effective treatments is long and bumpy, and recent cuts to federal funding for science could threaten progress. Having stable support is incredibly important for momentum, Stanton says. “When we have a loved one who gets sick, we want a treatment—we want something to cure them,” she says. “It doesn’t come out of thin air.”

This article is part of The Young American Scientists, an editorially independent project that was produced with financial support from Regeneron. Special thanks to the Museum of Science in Boston, where Stanton's portrait and video interview were captured.

Tanya Lewis was formerly senior desk editor for health and medicine at Scientific American. She wrote and edited stories for the website and print magazine on topics ranging from COVID to organ transplants. She also appeared on Scientific American’s podcast Science Quickly and wrote Scientific American’s weekly Health & Medicine newsletter. She held a number of positions over her nearly 10 years at Scientific American, including health editor, assistant news editor and associate editor at Scientific American Mind. Previously, she has written for outlets that include Insider, Wired, Science News and others. She has a degree in biomedical engineering from Brown University and one in science communication from the University of California, Santa Cruz. Follow her on Bluesky @tanyalewis.bsky.social

More by Tanya Lewis
Scientific American Magazine Vol 335 Issue 1This article was published with the title “Alice Stanton” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 335 No. 1 (), p. 56
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican072026-5dAxHPDgyJjKpGv2oo7ZFy

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe