New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Animals Have Personalities, Too—Which Fade Away in Group Situations

The persona of some fishes bends to conform to group dynamics, but it ultimately remains constant

Thomas Fuchs

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

As any pet owner will tell you, humans aren't the only animals with personalities. And it isn't just dogs and cats. In recent years scientists have found that members of many species, from hermit crabs to rats to fish, have unique dispositions, demonstrating consistent behavioral differences over time and across varying situations.

But how do social situations affect individual personalities? University of Bristol biologist Christos C. Ioannou and his colleagues sought to find out by turning to a small fish called the three-spined stickleback, which inhabits brackish coastal waters throughout the Northern Hemisphere. “They're found both as individuals and in social groups in the wild,” making them perfect for personality assessments across different settings, Ioannou says.

The researchers took 80 fish and placed each under a protective cover at one end of a tank. At the opposite end was some food. Crossing the tank to feed would seem risky to the sticklebacks because open water typically exposes them to the threat of predation.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Each fish behaved consistently over several days. Bolder ones quickly left the safety of the refuge to go for the food. Timid ones took longer to emerge and swam across the tank more cautiously. But when 10 sticklebacks were placed under the cover together, each fish's individual persona faded away. As with humans, the bolder individuals served as group leaders—albeit careful ones. “The first individuals come out relatively quickly, but it almost looks like they realize they're not being followed and so wait for others to catch up with them,” Ioannou says. When separated from the group later on, the fish regained their original personalities. The results were published in September in Science Advances.

The new findings suggest that group dynamics tamp down individual personalities, and the researchers say it is the first time that such suppression has been explicitly linked to an underlying cause: the need to conform when faced with a risky decision.

Animal personality researchers have historically focused on individuals while ignoring the way they behave in groups, and collective behavior researchers have focused on groups while downplaying individual differences, according to University of St. Andrews animal behavior researcher Mike Webster, who was not involved in the work. “What this study really does is bring those two streams of research together,” showing that animal personalities are flexible yet also persistent, he says.

Jason G. Goldman is a science journalist based in Los Angeles. He has written about animal behavior, wildlife biology, conservation, and ecology for Scientific American, Los Angeles magazine, the Washington Post, the Guardian, the BBC, Conservation magazine, and elsewhere. He contributes to Scientific American's "60-Second Science" podcast, and is co-editor of Science Blogging: The Essential Guide (Yale University Press). He enjoys sharing his wildlife knowledge on television and on the radio, and often speaks to the public about wildlife and science communication.

More by Jason G. Goldman
Scientific American Magazine Vol 315 Issue 6This article was published with the title “One's True Nature” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 315 No. 6 (), p. 24
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1216-24

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe