Applications for the Extension of Patents

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Buckles. Stephen E. Booth, of Orange, Conn., administrator of the es -t te of S. S. Hartshoen, deceased, has petitioned for the extension of tue above patent. Day of hearing, June 21,1869. Self*adjusting Wind Mill. Addison P. Brown, of Syracuse, N. Y., has petitioned for the extension of the above patent. Day of hearing, June 21,1869. Looms. S. T. Thomas, of Gilford, N. H., has applied for an extension of the above patent. Day of hearing, June 21,1869. Looms. S T, Thomas, of Gilford, N. H., has applied for an extension ot the above patent. Day of hearing June 21,1869. Speing bed Bottom. Hiram Tucker, of Newton, Mass., has applied for an extension of the above patents Day of hearing June 21,1869. Sand-Paper Cutting Machine. William Adamson, of Philadelphia, Pa., has petitioned for an extension of the above patent. Day of hearing, June 21,1869. Method of Raising and Lowering the Cutters op Harvesters. Jonathan F. Barrett, of North Granville, N. Y., has petitioned for the extension of the above patent. Day of hearing, June 21,1869. Machine for Making Bolts. William E. Ward, of Portchester, N. Y., has petitioned for an extension of the above patent. Day of hearing, June 21, 1869. Lanterns. Charles Waters, of Poughkeepsie, N. Y., has petitioned for the extension of the above patent. Day of hearing June 28,1859. Ship's Winches. Peter H. Jackson, of New York city, has petitioned lo r the extension of the above patent. Day of hearing, July 19,1869.

Scientific American Magazine Vol 20 Issue 18This article was published with the title “Applications for the Extension of Patents” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 20 No. 18 (), p. 285
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican05011869-285

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe