New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

A pair of gut bacteria may cause constipation

A new study pinpoints two species of bacteria that work together to dry out the lining of the gut and cause constipation

A man spends some quality time on the toilet in black and white photo

Kirn Vintage Stock/Corbis via Getty Images

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

It is as unfortunate an ailment as it is ubiquitous: at some point in our life, we will become constipated. Our gut is a delicate flower, and sometimes it just can’t cope with the even slightest of changes to our diet or environment: low water intake, a lack of adequate dietary fiber, a sedentary lifestyle, medications, and more can prevent you from “going.”

Gut bacteria are crucial to ensuring healthy digestion and defecation. But two species of bacteria may also be the cause of constipation: according to a new study, Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron and Akkermansia muciniphila appear to work in concert to break down colonic mucin, the slimy coating in our colon that keeps our poo moving along. Too little mucin means a drier and more constipation-prone colon.

"What excites me most about this study is that we've identified a specific mechanism by which gut bacteria can cause constipation,” says Tomonari Hamaguchi, a lecturer at Nagoya University in Japan and lead author of the study. He notes that constipation causes some 2.5 million doctor visits every year in the U.S.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


“Yet for many patients, current treatments provide only temporary relief because the underlying cause remains unknown,” he says.

In the study, which was published this week in Gut Microbes, the researchers modified one of the bacteria, B. thetaiotaomicron to prevent it from breaking down mucin. They then transplanted it and the other bacterium, A. muciniphila, into mice.

Interestingly, the mice’s colon mucin stayed intact. And the animals remained regular, with no signs of constipation. The findings indicate that both of the bacteria together, not just one or the other, pose a threat to mucin.

It’s unclear how widespread these bacteria are in people, but the results could open the door to new treatments for chronic constipation, especially for people who find no relief with the drugs and remedies that are already on the market. According to one estimate, as many as one in five people in North America may have chronic constipation, and it’s more common in women and older people.

“Not all constipation has the same cause, and if we can identify patients with this bacterial mechanism—for example, by measuring fecal Akkermansia levels as a biomarker—we may be able to move toward personalized treatment strategies instead of one-size-fits-all laxatives,” Hamaguchi says.

Jackie Flynn Mogensen is a breaking news reporter at Scientific American. Before joining SciAm, she was a science reporter at Mother Jones, where she received a National Academies Eric and Wendy Schmidt Award for Excellence in Science Communications in 2024. Mogensen holds a master’s degree in environmental communication and a bachelor’s degree in earth sciences from Stanford University. She is based in New York City.

More by Jackie Flynn Mogensen

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe