New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Atlantic Shark Populations Shrinking Fast

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The news does not look good for Jaws. A new study has found that the number of sharks has declined precipitously over the last decade. The findings, published in the current issue of the journal Science, suggest that the fierce predators may in fact be in danger of succumbing to human exploitation.

Julia K. Baum and her colleagues at Dalhousie University in Halifax, Nova Scotia, analyzed more than 15 years of logbook data collected by the U.S. National Marine Fisheries Service, which included one of the longest records of shark statistics available. The records covered longline fishing in the Northwest Atlantic Ocean and included nine species of sharks. With the exception of one species, the mako, all of the sharks experienced declines of more than 50 percent over the past eight to 15 years. The hammerhead shark population was the hardest hit, declining 89 percent since 1986. The results imply that sharks should be given conservation attention equal to that currently provided to other threatened marine animals, the scientists conclude. Carefully designed marine reserves and a reduction in fishing, they write, "could hold promise for safeguarding sharks and other large pelagic predators from further declines and ecological extinction."

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe