New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Atoms in 3D

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Image: PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS

The secret behind three-dimensional scenes in a movie is simple: the special glasses you wear separate blue and red images, creating two views that, when combined, produce an optical illusion. Now a scientist from the Nara Institute of Science and Technology in Japan has proposed a similar tactic for generating 3-D images of atoms. Hiroshi Daimon describes the idea in this week's Physical Review Letters.

One method physicists use to produce images of atoms¿photoelectron diffraction¿relies on high-energy photons that shake free some of electrons in a sample. These electrons then produce a diffraction pattern, from which some believe the sample's structure can be read. Daimon worked out a variation on this theme, bombarding crystals with circularly polarized light. The photons in this light have spin and angular momentum, which they transfer to the electrons they knock loose. As a result, the diffraction pattern is slightly rotated, either clockwise or counterclockwise depending on the original light.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Using both left and right circularly polarized light, Daimon created two different points of view of the same tungsten crystal (see image). These different vantages, he says, can be merged into a stereoscopic 3-D image. Further experimentation is needed to confirm that the technique really can work, but if it does, it might also be used to produce real-time 3-D video of atoms and molecules.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe