New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Bacterial Predators Feast on “Superbugs”

Hungry microbes can hunt down drug-resistant superbugs

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Scientists are turning to predatory bacteria to defeat drug-resistant infections. Microbiologists led by Daniel Kadouri, now at Rutgers University, lately have focused on two such predators—Micavibrio aeruginosavorus, which latches onto a germ and sucks out its innards, and Bdellovibrio bacteriovorus, which burrows into and parasitically reproduces within its prey. Kadouri's group previously showed that both species could kill dangerous microbes, but the predators had not been conclusively tested on drug-resistant strains. Thus, the team decided to unleash each species onto cell cultures of 14 drug-resistant varieties of bacteria commonly found in hospitals, then observed as the hunters wiped out large numbers of the pathogens. The results appeared online May 1 in the journal PLOS ONE.

But would the hunters attack human cells as well? In a study published in PLOS ONE on June 18, Kadouri's team found the microbes could kill bacteria linked with eye infections while leaving human eye cells untouched. “Exploiting nature, tilting the balance in the favor of the host by a means other than antibiotics, is a really important approach,” says Daniel Zurawski, a microbiologist at the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research who studies drug-resistant bacteria.

Every year nearly two million patients acquire infections—often caused by drug-resistant germs—in hospitals in the U.S. alone, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Even potent new antibiotics cannot wholly solve this problem, because colonies of virulent germs often encase themselves in biofilms—microscopic layers of protective slime that adhere to almost any surface. Previous work by Kadouri and others has found that predatory bacteria can infiltrate biofilms to kill the microorganisms inside, offering a new method of preventing infection.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Because of the potential sensitivity of an individual's immune system to microbes swimming around the bloodstream, Kadouri thinks the best predatory-bacteria treatment plan “is to apply them onto surface wounds or burns.” He and his colleagues are now trying these therapies on live animals, with an eye toward eventual human trials.

Charles Q. Choi is a frequent contributor to Scientific American. His work has also appeared in The New York Times, Science, Nature, Wired, and LiveScience, among others. In his spare time, he has traveled to all seven continents.

More by Charles Q. Choi
Scientific American Magazine Vol 309 Issue 2This article was published with the title “Bug vs. Superbug” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 309 No. 2 (), p. 24
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0813-24a

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe