New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Here’s Why Bad Sleep and Toxic Thoughts Go Hand-in-Hand

Findings reveal the memory-related brain processes that generate unwanted thoughts when people are sleep deprived

Illustration of a person seated with their head in their hand, appearing overwhelmed or distressed. The individual's head is replaced by a tangled, scribbled mass that engulfs and obscures it

Rob Dobi/Getty Images

Imagine you are attending a friend’s housewarming party, and—in front of everyone—you spill a glass of red wine on their brand-new white couch. You are so mortified that every time you see this friend afterward, you immediately think of the couch mishap.

Research has shown that how you react to that unwelcome recollection will depend on how much sleep you get. If you’re well rested, your brain will be able to quickly suppress the negative memory. But if you are someone who is plagued by insomnia, then intrusive thoughts about what happened—and the unpleasant emotions attached—will probably continue to bother you for some time.

Now a new study published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA provides insight into what, exactly, goes wrong in the sleep-deprived brain when such unwanted thoughts intrude. “This could be an important piece of the puzzle in understanding why it is that people who are chronically sleep-deprived become at high risk of developing mental health problems,” says Scott Cairney, an associate professor of psychology at the University of York in England and senior author of the findings.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Cairney and his colleagues showed in an earlier study that sleep deprivation impairs people’s ability to suppress unwanted thoughts. But the team wanted to take those behavioral observations “one step further,” he says. “What’s actually going on under the hood, in the brain, when people are not getting enough sleep?”

Previous research has demonstrated that the retrieval of memories of past events involves the hippocampus and that of a different part of the brain, the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (rDLPFC), is responsible for suppressing that retrieval process. Cairney and his colleagues hypothesized that sleep deprivation impairs the rDLPFC’s ability to “slam the brakes” on the retrieval processes, he says.

To test this, the researchers recruited 85 students. First, the team trained them to associate images of neutral faces with specific scenes, some of which were negative, such as a car crash or a fight. “They form a rich connection between the face and the scene, so when you present them with the face in isolation, their brains will automatically engage in a retrieval process,” Cairney says.

Next, the researchers divided the participants into two groups. One group was made to stay up all night while the other was allowed to sleep in beds in the lab. Participants in the latter group were monitored for how much time they spent in rapid-eye-movement (REM) and non-REM sleep.

In the morning all of the participants were shown images of the faces they had been previously trained with, but this time, the participants had to either think about the memory they had been trained to associate with the face or to suppress it. Throughout this task, their brain activity was measured using a functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) scanner.

The results confirmed Cairney and his colleagues’ hunch. Compared with the participants who had slept, those who had stayed up all night had significantly diminished rDLPFC activity when they were supposed to be suppressing intrusive thoughts. Conversely, activity in their hippocampus was elevated, likely because the rDLPFC was not shutting down the retrieval process it was engaging in. This finding showed that sleep deprivation does not cause a general decline in brain activity, Cairney says, but rather seems to specifically affect certain parts of the brain that are involved in executive function.

Out of the participants who had slept the night before, the researchers also found a significant positive correlation between the amount of time they spent in REM sleep and rDLPFC activity, specifically when they were engaging in the memory suppression task. “That’s interesting because many disorders associated with debilitating intrusive thoughts, such as depression and PTSD, are also associated with disturbances in REM,” Cairney says.

The “intriguing” new study suggests a key role that REM sleep seems to play in maintaining adequate memory control, says Zara Bergström, a cognitive psychologist at the University of Kent in England, who was not involved in the work. She adds, however, that “it will be necessary for future research to manipulate REM sleep directly” to confirm whether it does have a causal role in controlling memories and thoughts.

Maria Wimber, a cognitive neuroscientist at the University of Glasgow, who also was not involved in the research, adds that the new study’s findings “have real potential to inform therapeutic approaches.”

“Interventions that enhance REM sleep could become part of the therapy for disorders that are characterized by intrusive memories, like post-traumatic stress disorder,” she says. This type of response might also be attempted for acute trauma—a possible preventive measure to ensure that toxic memories and flashbacks never emerge at all.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe