New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Baghdad Blasts: Earthquake Detectors Map Sounds of War

Seismic equipment installed in Iraq to measure to detect and measure earthquakes could also help emergency responders following mortar attacks and car bombs

Seismic equipment that was installed in Iraq to detect earthquakes has also recorded plenty of other big bangs — explosions from nearby mortars and car bombs. The individual "fingerprints" of these explosions could be used by experts to reconstruct these fast-paced incidents, and may even have real-time applications to help responders, according to a new study.

In Baghdad throughout 2006, the sound of bombs was common. But on the night of Oct. 10 of that year, when a mortar round struck the U.S. Forward Operating Base Falcon's ammunition supply depot, the explosive detonations that followed were, even for Baghdad, extraordinary, experts have said.

What happened at the ammunition depot, captured by onlookers on video, is referred to in the military as a "cook-off," when excessive heat causes ammunition to explode prematurely. The fires caused by the mortar strike triggered a series of explosions, which escalated quickly into a nightmarish scene of blazing fire and blast upon blast. In the new study, the researchers describe glowing fragments spewing into the air and mushroom-shaped clouds rising from the flames, which led some observers to suspect a nuclear attack. [The 10 Greatest Explosions Ever]


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


 

 

The researchers also reported that tremors shook the base, damaged nearby structures, and were felt by Baghdad residents to the north. Rounds were still exploding and fires burning well into the afternoon of Oct. 11, according to the news agency Stars and Stripes, which also mentioned that explosions at the depot "rattled windows" at another U.S. military installation, Camp Liberty, located near the Baghdad airport.

Other "ears" were picking up the blasts, too. Four miles (7 km) from the base, a seismometer, installed at the Baghdad Seismic Observatory to detect earthquakes, recorded every bang and boom. It was one of several seismometers that had only recently been installed to look at how the Earth's upper layer called the crust in the region could affect the frequency and magnitude of large quakes.

Ghassan I. Aleqabi, lead author of the new study, and his colleagues installed the Iraqi seismometers. After the fire and explosions rocked the depot in 2006, he and study co-author Michael Wysession wondered what the complex cacophony of violent blasts might have sounded like to their seismic equipment.

The equipment did not let them down. From the data recorded during the Oct. 10 explosions, the researchers were able to piece together sequences of events during that night, blast by blast, with certain types of explosions having distinct and recognizable "seismic fingerprints" that helped the scientists to identify them. [Wild Explosions on Video]

Wysession, a professor of geophysics at Washington University in St. Louis, told Live Science that a single broadband seismometer like the one in Baghdad is designed to sample a range of frequencies. Seismometers visualize sounds as waves — the amplitude, or height of the wave, indicates how loud the sound is, while the frequency of the waves reveals how "high" or "low" the sound is, measured in hertz.

But how can a seismograph tell the difference between an earthquake and a bomb blast, let alone between types of man-made explosions?

 "Think of your own ears," Wysession told Live Science. You can listen to an oboe and a clarinet, he said, and even if they're playing the same note, your ear can still tell which instrument is which. A seismograph can similarly distinguish between a mortar firing and a car bomb, "even though they both make a bang," he said.

According to Wysession, a characteristic of mortar blasts is that they peak at about 5 hertz. He and his colleagues were able to pinpoint when several mortar blasts happened during the incident by comparing matching seismic signatures that identified them, which differed from the seismic traces left by other types of explosions.

Sound wave amplitude, Wysession said, could also give an estimate of the distance of an explosion. "Obviously if a firecracker goes off and it's a mile away, it's going to have a very different sound than if it's right next to your ear," he said. And the same holds true for a seismograph, which records a different "picture" of sounds when they're farther away.

"Forensic seismology," as Wysession calls it, may seem like an unusual application for earthquake-detectingequipment, but it's actually not uncommon to find seismometers used for a wide range of scientific purposes.

"We track herds of caribou with seismometers," Wysession told Live Science. "We monitor ice cracking and glaciers' flow. You can look at noise levels in seismometers over decades to track how the intensity of storms has increased over decades due to global warming." In fact, he added, "Anything that makes a sound, you can use a seismometer for."

The findings were published Dec. 22 in the journal Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

Original article on Live Science.

Copyright 2015 LiveScience, a Purch company. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Mindy Weisberger is a science writer covering biology, paleontology, climate change and space. She studied film at Columbia University and produced, wrote and directed media for the American Museum of Natural History for more than a decade, creating videos about dinosaurs, astrophysics, biodiversity and evolution that have appeared in museums and science centers worldwide. Her book Rise of the Zombie Bugs: The Surprising Science of Parasitic Mind-Control will be published in the spring of 2025 by Hopkins Press.

More by Mindy Weisberger

LiveScience is one of the biggest and most trusted popular science websites operating today, reporting on the latest discoveries, groundbreaking research and fascinating breakthroughs that impact you and the wider world.

More by LiveScience

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe