New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

‘Bat accelerator’ unlocks new clues to how these animals navigate

Bats use echolocation to get around, but it wasn’t clear how these creatures managed to navigate dense environments—until now

Flying pipistrelle bat on mostly black background, some vegetation

A pipistrelle bat.

Rudmer Zwerver

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Bats are impressive navigators. Like so many mini submarines equipped with sonar, they deftly navigate dark forests and caves by listening for the echoes of their own calls. But how bats can tell which echo to follow while flitting around in a sea of overlapping and competing signals pinging off the myriad surfaces in their environments has been a mystery—until now.

In a new study published in Proceedings of the Royal Society B, researchers lay out evidence that bats find their way by listening to how their own movement changes sounds.

Imagine being at a party with hundreds or even thousands of people all talking at once; it’s difficult to make out a single speaker, explains Marc Holderied, a professor of sensory biology at the University of Bristol in England and an author of the study. That’s comparable to what a bat may be dealing with as the animal zooms around a dense forest—a chaotic environment that can make it hard to echolocate.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


To solve this problem, the animals appear to rely on Doppler shift, or how a sound’s pitch changes as a bat travels.

“As the bat is moving,” Holderied says, “this Doppler shift, in this complex echo of thousands of reflectors, carries information.”

How the team reached that conclusion is an impressive and strange tale. Holderied and his colleagues observed wild pipistrelle bats using a contraption that they dubbed the “bat accelerator.” The machine is basically an eight-meter tunnel of treadmills covered in plastic leaves—about 8,000 of them all stapled on by hand, explains Athia Haron, a medical engineering research associate at the University of Manchester in England and a study co-author.

The researchers theorized that if bats picked up on the Doppler effect, then the direction that the foliage treadmill was moving in would affect how fast the animals flew.

When the treadmill moved in the direction of the bats’ flight, the critters sped up. When the foliage appeared to come toward them, however, they slowed down. “We tricked them into thinking that their speed is different,” Holderied says.

The results suggest the bats take the Doppler effect into account as they fly and use it to control their speed.

Researchers already knew of some bat species that are so-called Doppler specialists, Holderied says, but pipistrelle bats aren’t among them. The new findings indicate that the Doppler effect is used by bats that aren’t Doppler specialists.

And the bizarre experiment could help engineers enhance navigation systems for drones or self-driving cars, Haron says—something she has already begun to explore. “If that pans out, that would benefit a lot of navigation systems that fail in these kinds of cluttered environments,” she says.

Jackie Flynn Mogensen is a breaking news reporter at Scientific American. Before joining SciAm, she was a science reporter at Mother Jones, where she received a National Academies Eric and Wendy Schmidt Award for Excellence in Science Communications in 2024. Mogensen holds a master’s degree in environmental communication and a bachelor’s degree in earth sciences from Stanford University. She is based in New York City.

More by Jackie Flynn Mogensen

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe