Beating Breast Cancer

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Administering an extra dose of radiotherapy to patients with early breast cancer greatly reduces the risk of local recurrence, according to a study conducted by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) breast cancer and radiotherapy groups. The findings will be presented today in Istanbul at a meeting of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

In order to determine whether such a booster would aid women who had undergone breast conserving surgery, researchers studied 5,569 patients, 95.5 percent of whom had had the tumor completely removed. All patients had radiation to the whole breast, and were then randomly selected to receive either a local booster or no further radiotherapy. Several years later, whereas 182 patients in the control group experienced a recurrence of the cancer, only 109 patients in the booster group suffered a setback-- a risk reduction of nearly 50 percent to date. Women under the age of 40 benefitted the most, lowering their chance of recurrence by 54 percent.

Researchers will continue to monitor the patients in years to come to see whether the booster reduces mortality. In the meantime, principal trial coordinator Harry Bartelink asserts that the findings should change clinical practice immediately. "These impressive results mean that a boost should now be considered the standard treatment for early breast cancer," he says, "particularly in younger women."

Kate Wong is an award-winning science writer and senior editor for features at Scientific American, where she has focused on evolution, ecology, anthropology, archaeology, paleontology and animal behavior. She is fascinated by human origins, which she has covered for nearly 30 years. Recently she has become obsessed with birds. Her reporting has taken her to caves in France and Croatia that Neandertals once called home to the shores of Kenya’s Lake Turkana in search of the oldest stone tools in the world, as well as to Madagascar on an expedition to unearth ancient mammals and dinosaurs, the icy waters of Antarctica, where humpback whales feast on krill, and a “Big Day” race around the state of Connecticut to find as many bird species as possible in 24 hours. Wong is co-author, with Donald Johanson, of Lucy’s Legacy: The Quest for Human Origins. She holds a bachelor of science degree in biological anthropology and zoology from the University of Michigan. Follow her on Bluesky @katewong.bsky.social

More by Kate Wong

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe