New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Bees Boost Coffee Crop Yield

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Usually the only buzz associated with coffee comes from the jolt of caffeine it delivers. But research published today in the journal Nature suggests that a buzz of a different kind—one originating from bees—can increase coffee yields by as much as 50 percent.

The java-producing shrub Coffea arabica is self-pollinating, so scientists thought that the presence of pollinating insects would have little or no effect on how the plant fared. But when David W. Roubik of the Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute studied 50 coffee plants from a Panamanian plantation, he found that those visited by insects bore fruit that was 7 percent heavier on average than that produced by plants protected from insect company. More specifically, plants visited solely by African honeybees showed a weight increase of 25 percent. Roubik notes that different pollinators affected crop yields to varying degrees but that "bees consistently controlled over 36 percent of the total production."

Roubik reports that coffee yields from Caribbean islands, where bee colonies are virtually nonexistent, are less than half of those from similar sites in Mexico and Central America, where bees are ubiquitous. Moreover, yields of coffee crops in Ivory Coast, Ghana, Kenya, Cameroon and Indonesia have decreased by 20 to 50 percent despite the fact that the areas set aside for coffee cultivation have grown up to fivefold over the past few decades. Traditional coffee plantations included a variety of plants grown above and below C. arabica, which provided diverse habitat for wildlife such as birds and bees. Most current commercial crops, in contrast, are grown on coffee-only fields. Such aggressive cultivation can harm pollinators by, among other things, eliminating nesting sites. Roubik suggests that "coffee plants would benefit from being grown in habitats that are suitable for sustaining valuable pollinators."

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe