New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Best of the Best Top 10 Cities: Green Living, Health, Air Quality and Technology

To coincide with Scientific American's "Cities" special topic issue, we gathered recent lists ranking U.S. cities on aspects of green living, pollution, health and technology. Today, we feature the cities that showed up most frequently on the top 10 lists to determine the overall top performers, Part 5 of 5

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Top 10 Overall Performances

  • San Francisco

  • Washington, D.C.

  • Seattle

  • Boston

  • New York City

  • Minneapolis

  • Denver

  • Portland, Ore

  • Los Angeles

  • Chicago

These cities earned the highest combined scores. In order to earn a spot on this list, cities had to rank highly on positive lists (such as "best public transit") and rank low or not at all on negative lists (such as "worst allergies").


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Top 10 Most Frequent List Appearances

  • New York

  • San Francisco

  • Washington, D.C.

  • Seattle

  • Boston

  • Minneapolis

  • Denve

  • Los Angeles

  • Chicago

  • Miami

These cities showed up most frequently on the lists featured in Scientific American's top 10 cities lists for the past four days (green living, health, air quality, technology). New York City, the overall winner, appeared on more than 60 percent of all the collected lists, whereas the cities that tied for second earned spots on almost half the lists; the third-place cities showed up in the rankings about 30 percent of the time.

Not all of the lists on which these overall scores are based were created using conventional statistical or scientific methods, therefore their validity should be suspect. We have presented this information mainly for discussion. Scientific American gathered the lists from several online sources. To earn a place on the "overall performance" list, cities had to appear on multiple lists, and earned points based on their rankings. Each city's points were added up to arrive at the overall score. A high rank on a positive list such as "best public transit" earned a city points whereas a spot on a negative list such as "worst allergies" detracted points. Each city's points added up to its overall score.

Part 1—The Top 10 Greenest Cities Part 2—The Top 10 Healthiest Cities Part 3—The Cities Ranked by Cleanest and Dirtiest Air Part 4—The Top 10 Technologically Advanced Cities

Sophie Bushwick was formerly the technology editor at Scientific American. She makes frequent appearances on radio shows such as Science Friday and television networks, including CBS, MSNBC and National Geographic. She has more than a decade of experience as a science journalist based in New York City and previously worked at outlets such as Popular Science,Discover and Gizmodo. Follow Bushwick on X (formerly Twitter) @sophiebushwick

More by Sophie Bushwick

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe