New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Bionic Finger ‘Sees’ Inside Objects by Poking Them

A robotic finger’s supersensitive touches could probe inside body parts and circuits

Illustration of bionic finger pushing on human arm.

Thomas Fuchs

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Human fingers don't just sense what a surface feels like. They also tell us a lot about what's underneath it: a really firm handshake, for example, can reveal where some bones are, and, with enough prodding, one can even locate tendons.

Inspired by this capability, scientists have developed a fingerlike device that maps an object's internal structures in 3-D by touching its surface. Earlier tactile sensors detected external shape, stiffness and texture but not subsurface details. For a study in Cell Reports Physical Science, the researchers tested their device by scanning simulated human tissue and electronic circuitry.

“This bionic finger has exciting application prospects in material characterization and biomedical engineering,” says study co-author Zhiming Chen, an engineer at China's Wuyi University. “The technology could also be incorporated into robots and prosthetics, which is our next research topic.”


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The new “finger” contains a carbon fiber tactile sensor, which returns a stronger signal when compressed against stiffer objects. The device moves across an object's surface, poking several times at each location to feel for increasing levels of pressure. This process can reveal subsurface details, such as hard layers inside softer materials. “When pressed by this bionic finger, hard objects retain their shape, whereas soft objects deform when sufficient pressure is applied,” says Wuyi engineer Jian Yi Luo, the study's senior author. “This information is transmitted to a computer, along with the recorded position, and displayed in real time as a 3-D image.”

Other imaging methods, including x-ray, PET, MRI and ultrasound, have their own pros and cons. X-rays carry health risks, and other options lack portability or speed. Many are expensive. The new device is unlikely to be significantly cheaper than ultrasound, but it may provide better resolution. “It offers another way of doing things, which has its own advantages in specific contexts,” says University College London engineer Sriram Subramanian, who was not involved in the work. “I don't think it's easy to do ultrasound imaging of printed electronic circuits.”

In simulated human tissue, the device pinpointed bones and a blood vessel. For a flexible electronic circuit encapsulated in soft material, it detected a circuit break and an incorrectly drilled hole. “When we make those [devices], we always worry that if something is broken, the only way you can know is to take it apart,” Subramanian says.

The device will struggle to map objects whose outer surface is too hard, and it may miss details underneath hard layers. The researchers plan to extend their invention into more dimensions, however, perhaps probing from other directions as well. “This system might be expanded to multiple fingers, just like our hands, to realize ‘omnidirectional’ detection,” Chen says. “This would enable it to get more complete information.”

Simon Makin is a freelance science journalist based in the U.K. His work has appeared in New Scientist, the Economist, Scientific American and Nature, among others. He covers the life sciences and specializes in neuroscience, psychology and mental health. Follow Makin on X (formerly Twitter) @SimonMakin

More by Simon Makin
Scientific American Magazine Vol 328 Issue 5This article was published with the title “Bionic Finger” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 328 No. 5 (), p. 20
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0523-20

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe