New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Book Review: The Surprising Comeback of Our Least Appreciated Sense

The nose knows more than we thought

Cover of the book The Forgotten Sense

The Forgotten Sense: The New Science of Smell and the Extraordinary Power of the Nose
by Jonas Olofsson.
Mariner, 2025 ($28)

As COVID spread across the world in early 2020, people began to report losing their sense of smell. Public health organizations were focused on tracking the spread of the virus based on more traditional symptoms of respiratory illness such as cough and fever, and the loss of smell was initially treated more like a curious anecdote than an important signal. But olfaction researcher Jonas Olofsson knew better: “I like to think I helped protect the public when I repeated to journalists in an almost parrot-­like manner that readers and listeners who suddenly lose their sense of smell should isolate themselves immediately,” he writes in his new book on olfaction’s central role in our lives.

Olofsson is accustomed to defending the significance of smell, which many people seem to take for granted. For evi­­dence, he refers to surveys that asked Americans to choose whether their sense of smell or their pinky toe was more valuable. Half chose the toe. In a 2021 follow-up survey, only 15 percent of responders were on team toe, but Olofsson contends that we still don’t adequately understand or appreciate the “special intelligence of the nose.”


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Smell hasn’t always been the underdog of the senses. In previous centuries, odors were integral to everything from spirituality to morality to medicine: burnt offerings reached the gods by wafting to the heavens, medieval devils were thought to reek of flatulence, and doctors used scents to both diagnose and cure. In our current, screen-saturated society that depends on vision and hearing, smell might seem like an evolutionary relic. But although our sense of smell may be primal, it is not primitive.

Olofsson argues that instead of passively reacting to odor molecules in isolation, our olfactory brain works with other brain regions to interpret smells. “The sense of smell does not act on its own,” he says, “but is smarter than that—it takes in all the cues in the environment and assesses them using all our accumulated knowledge.”

Using this “cognitive per­­spective” on olfaction to guide readers through the current landscape of smell, Olofsson addresses the complex pheromone debate, the “swamp” of research on aromatherapy, e-noses and other digital smell technologies, and his own successes with smell-based brain training. His work reveals how this ancient and unassuming ability holds profound untapped potential to enrich our lives.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe