New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Boom in Finding Dwarf Planets May Be Over

The bonanza in spotting Pluto's peers nears its end

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

For decades Pluto was the undisputed heavyweight champion in the far reaches of the outer solar system. Now astronomers know that the beloved world is just one of many known dwarf planets, most of which orbit the sun out beyond Neptune.

The discoveries that led to Pluto's demotion from planet to dwarf planet arrived in a rapid burst that peaked about a decade ago. Between 2002 and 2007 astronomer Mike Brown of the California Institute of Technology and his colleagues discovered several major objects, including the dwarf planets Eris, Makemake and Haumea (although another group also claims credit for Haumea). Since that flurry of activity, the discovery of large objects in the outer solar system has stalled, even though Brown's group left broad swaths of the sky unsearched.

The reason? Most of the big, bright objects have already been found, according to a new study. Megan Schwamb, a former graduate student of Brown's, now at the Academia Sinica in Taiwan, conducted a large-scale survey of the outer solar system, then extrapolated from the search to estimate the total numbers of objects. “It says that there are about 12,” Schwamb says, adding that nine are already known. “That's really telling us that we are pretty complete on the inventory of bright dwarf planets.” Schwamb and her colleagues published their findings in January in the Astronomical Journal.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Even though astronomers have not scanned the entire sky, they appear to have covered the areas laden with bright objects. It is possible, however, that a dwarf planet has escaped notice, says Darin Ragozzine of the Florida Institute of Technology. The starry plane of the Milky Way could obscure a dwarf planet, he notes, but it is unlikely that several await discovery.

“We had this golden age of finding these dwarf planets,” Schwamb observes. “That era is over.” But there may be similar objects farther out that are just too faint to spot today. “They're lurking in the shadows waiting for someone to detect them,” she adds.

John Matson is a former reporter and editor for Scientific American who has written extensively about astronomy and physics.

More by John Matson
Scientific American Magazine Vol 310 Issue 3This article was published with the title “Lonely Dwarf Planets” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 310 No. 3 (), p. 27
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0314-27

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe