New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Brazilian Trees May Harbor Millions of Unidentified Species of Bacteria

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

The Atlantic forest of Brazil, which in the past 400 years has been reduced to less than 8 percent of its original size, could contain as many as 13 million unidentified species of bacteria, a new study has found. Not only do the results point to an abundance of life still remaining the forest, but they indicate a potentially untapped resource for drug development.

"Besides the importance of these bacteria in ecosystem stability, they can also be sources of biochemical compounds for the pharmaceutical industry and agriculture," says Marcio Lambais of the University of Sao Paulo in Brazil, whose team published their results in today's issue of Science.

The scientists conducted their survey by collecting 20 to 30 leaves from each of nine different tree species throughout the forest. In the lab, the researchers processed about 12 grams of leaves from each tree at a time, rinsing them in special solution that dislodged surface microbes. They analyzed the DNA from the microbes to get a general view of how similar the communities in different trees were to each other. From there, they selected two tree species that hosted similar bacterial communities and one species that contained a very distinct community. They sequenced fragments of DNA from the microbes to get a more detailed picture of the different bacteria present and to estimate the diversity in the forest.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The team found that even trees of the same species had some variation when it came to the bacterial communities living on their leaves, but there was significantly more variation among trees of different species. Calculations indicated that each tree could harbor anywhere between 95 to 671 different species of bacteria. And when the scientists extrapolated the number to include all leafy surfaces, they came up with 2 million to 13 million new bacterial species.

"We were quite surprised and euphoric when we extrapolated the figures. We suspected that the diversity would be high, but not that high. Now we need to understand how these communities function and their roles in the ecosystem," Lambais remarks. He and his team are currently studying the diversity of bacteria on the leaves of seven more tree species from another location in the forest. By looking at a higher number of individual trees, they hope to gain a better understanding of, among other things, whether the bacterial communities are affected by the location of their host tree.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe