On supporting science journalism
If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.
In the 19th-century U.S., finding a mother of young children who worked was rare. The big exception was black mothers, many of whom were employed as domestics. That situation has changed, most likely because the economy since the early 20th century began creating an increasing number of white-collar jobs that could help support a more affluent way of life. The movement of mothers out of the home and into offices and shops happened all over the Western world, with some countries such as Austria, Belgium and the Netherlands substantially exceeding the U.S. in the proportion of mothers with very young children in the workforce.
Folk wisdom has long held that working mothers do severe harm to their children, and indeed one academic, University of Alberta chemist Gordon Freeman, claimed in a 1990 article in the Canadian Journal of Physics that they inflict "serious psychological damage" on their children, leading to teenage sex, drug use and other problems.
Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism
Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.
When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.
Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber
