New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Caffeine Keeps Garden Pests at Bay

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


A mocha latte might be your favorite way to start the day, but the same cannot be said for slugs and snails. According to a study published today in the journal Nature, caffeine solutions sprayed onto plants can deter and even kill the pesky mollusks. Farmers must often tolerate these destructive creatures because most pesticides are deemed too toxic for use on crops. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration classifies caffeine as "safe," however, prompting optimism that the substance could form the basis for an acceptable crop pesticide.

Robert Hollingsworth of the U.S. Department of Agriculture¿s Agricultural Research Service in Hilo, Hawaii, and his colleagues discovered caffeine¿s killer effect while testing it against a frog that plagues potted plants in Hawaii. The team noticed that slugs and snails, not the frogs, in the treated area were the ones that were dying. Further tests revealed that even a 0.01 percent caffeine treatment sprayed on plant leaves made them unpalatable to the mollusks. Solutions containing 1 to 2 percent of the substance killed them. (For comparison, a typical cup of instant coffee contains 0.05 percent caffeine.)

Exactly how caffeine kills the mollusks is not known, but the researchers posit that it may alter their neurological function. The chemical may not be effective against all garden pests, though. "Slugs and snails may be more susceptible to contact poisoning from caffeine than other animals," the authors write. "This is because caffeine is highly soluble in water, an important component of the mucus produced by the locomotive ¿foot¿ of mollusks." Clearly, mollusks get a slightly different kick out of caffeine than humans do.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe