New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

How Cancers Grow [Video]

Researchers believe at least six key things have to go wrong for most tumors to develop

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

A little more than a dozen years ago two researchers came up with a way of thinking about how tumors grow that changed the way most of the scientific community considered the hundred or more different diseases we call cancer. The varied and complex ways that normal cells become malignant, Douglas Hanahan and Robert Weinberg famously wrote in 2000, could be divided into six main steps—ranging from dividing uncontrollably to avoiding self-destruction. Developing treatments that targeted those essential processes should make cancer therapy much more predictable and effective, they argued.

Things did not turn out quite that way, as George Johnson wrote in the November 2013 issue of Scientific American. If anything, researchers have since learned that the various cellular pathways and molecular signals that prompt an otherwise normal cell to become malignant are even more complicated than they already thought. But Hanahan and Weinberg’s original insight still holds up pretty well as a general way of understanding the underlying process. Douglas Hanahan talks about the six original hallmarks and possibly two new additions in the following video, which was filmed at the 2012 meeting of the European Society for Medical Oncology in Vienna.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Video courtesy of the European Journal of Cancer

Christine Gorman is a health and science writer.

More by Christine Gorman
Scientific American Magazine Vol 309 Issue 5This article was published with the title “How Cancers Grow [Video]” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 309 No. 5 ()
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican112013-7nN8ihhvmedsXKaY27vGPd

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe