New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Cannibal Spiders May Have Poor Impulse Control

Some female wolf spiders prioritize food over sex

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Spider courtship is a risky business. In some species, females routinely decide that they would rather eat a male than mate with him, and researchers have struggled for decades to understand why. A recent experiment with a type of Spanish wolf spider suggests that the reason may depend on the spider's personality.

A virgin spider cannot be sure how many chances she will have to mate. Every male could be her last, and if she eats all of them, she will never reproduce. Why would a spider take this risk? One possibility is that females are choosy, holding out for large, healthy males with good genes and devouring the rest. Another possibility is the aggressive spillover hypothesis, which suggests that some females have strong predatory instincts that spill over into aggression toward potential mates. These females might eat males even when they would be better off mating with them.

To learn more about cannibalistic spiders, researchers at the Experimental Station of Arid Zones in Spain and their colleagues caught 80 juvenile females of the species Lycosa hispanica—a type of wolf spider—and fed them as much as they wanted while they matured. Some females put on weight more quickly than others. “Since all females had similar prey availability, we estimated that female growth rate would be the result of female voraciousness,” says Rubén Rabaneda-Bueno, the study's lead author.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


After each female molted to adulthood, the researchers placed a male in her enclosure. Females that ate their suitors were offered additional chances with new males. Most of the cannibal females were choosy. They ate males that were in poor condition and mated with males that were of high quality. “But we found that there were a few females that would consistently get a male and kill it and get another male and kill it—so they were really aggressive,” says Jordi Moya-Laraño, the study's senior author.

The most aggressive females killed big, healthy males as often as they killed scrawny ones. The same females also had the highest growth rates, indicating that they were the most aggressive toward prey. “In this study, a female personality trait—her voracity toward prey—was correlated with her aggressiveness toward males,” Rabaneda-Bueno says. “Our results provide evidence that different female personalities can lead to different outcomes in the interactions between males and females in a sexual cannibal.”

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe