New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Carbon Rock Lock: Storing CO2 on the East Coast

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Sucking carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases from smokestacks and burying them underneath the ground is a key technology cited by politicians and scientists as a way to help combat climate change. One open question is where best to store the CO2. A recent analysis points to the volcanic rock off the East Coast of the U.S.

Such rock, known as basalt, might be better than other sites, such as deep saline aquifers or nearly empty oil wells, because the rock not only stores CO2 but also over a relatively short period of years forms carbonate minerals out of it—in other words, limestone. And coastal basalt has the added benefit of having an overlying ocean, which acts as a second barrier of protection against the gas leaking out.

Research led by geophysicist David S. Goldberg of Columbia University’s Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory had previously shown that basalt lies off the West Coast of California, Oregon and Washington. His group’s latest search has turned up vast deposits in the East off the coast of Georgia, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York and South Carolina. One formation off of New Jersey could hold as much as one billion metric tons of CO2, report Goldberg and his team in the online January 4 Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA. Of course, the world’s nations emit over 30 billion metric tons of CO2 a year.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


If scientists can show that CO2 stays put underground—experiments are under way off the coast of Oregon and in Iceland—then basalt could become important considering how widespread it is, points out Klaus S. Lackner, director of the Lenfest Center for Sustainable Energy at the Earth Institute. “The ­Siberian basalt traps, the Deccan flats in India—there are enormous amounts of basalt” around the world, he notes.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe