New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

CDC Vaccine Website Promotes Antiscience Claims of Autism Ties

The CDC this week quietly changed its official language to suggest vaccines may cause autism, a claim that scientists say has no basis in evidence

CDC headquarters sign

sshepard/Getty Images

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has quietly revised a vaccine safety page on its website to introduce language that suggests uncertainty over whether vaccines cause autism, echoing ideas promoted by Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., a longtime vaccine skeptic.

Experts who spoke to Scientific American decried the changes as anti-science and potentially harmful. “This is a tragedy,” says University of Minnesota epidemiologist Michael Osterholm.

The administration’s move rejects decades of evidence showing there is no link between vaccines and autism, he says, adding that the changed guidance poses a public health risk because it could discourage vaccine uptake.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The website change “signals that truth carries no weight in the current and future discussions on vaccines,” and because of that, Osterholm says, “children will die.”

Previously, the CDC webpage cited decades of research showing that vaccines do not cause autism. The new version, which was apparently updated on Wednesday, states that the claim “vaccines do not cause autism” is not evidence-based and that “studies supporting a link have been ignored by health authorities.”

Since 1998 researchers across seven countries have conducted more than 40 high-quality studies involving more than 5.6 million people that have investigated such claims and have found no link between autism and vaccines, said Susan J. Kressly, president of the American Academy of Pediatrics, in a statement. One 2019 study, for example, found no evidence of a tie between autism and the measles, mumps and rubella vaccine in a group of more than 657,000 children.

“There is no link between vaccines and autism,” Kressly said. “Anyone repeating this harmful myth is misinformed or intentionally trying to mislead parents.”

The CDC update also states that officials will start investigating early childhood vaccinations and autism.

“It will be hard for the public to trust anything the CDC has to say after this,” says Brian Lee, an epidemiologist at Drexel Dornsife School of Public Health.

The CDC did not immediately respond to Scientific American’s request for comment.

Humberto Basilio is a Mexican science journalist covering policy, health, misconduct, archaeology and the environment. He is also a former news intern at Scientific American. His work has been published in the New York Times, National Geographic, Science, Nature, and more.

More by Humberto Basilio

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe