New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

These cells in the body remember fat. Here’s what that means for weight loss

Obesity leaves a lasting imprint on fat and immune cells in ways that might make weight regain harder to avoid

a microscope image of fat cells colored red and yellow

Colored scanning electron micrograph (SEM) of a sample of fat tissue, showing fat cells (adipocytes).

STEVE GSCHMEISSNER/SCIENCE PHOTO LIBRARY/Getty Images

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Weight loss is notoriously hard to maintain. Within a few years most people regain the pounds they initially lose, whether through dieting, exercise, surgery or weight-loss medications such as the popular glucagonlike peptide 1 (GLP-1) drugs. Recent research suggests fat cells’ “memory” could explain why.

Cells that store fat, or adipocytes, and immune cells, such as macrophages, that live in fat tissue can remember weight long after it’s lost. And scientists suggest obesity causes lasting changes to those cells that make it easier to revert the body to a state of obesity, even after significant weight loss. The changes are etched into the cells’ epigenome, the instructions that tell each cell to read specific genes that control their function, explains Ferdinand von Meyenn, who studies nutrition and metabolic epigenetics at the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich. This ensures that a liver cell doesn’t suddenly behave like a neuron, for example. In people with obesity, lasting epigenetic changes might prime the body to regain weight more easily if they consume more calories.

Von Meyenn’s team measured gene activity in individual cells with a technique called RNA sequencing to compare fat tissue from people with obesity before they had bariatric surgery with similar tissue from people who didn’t have obesity. Even after the participants with obesity had lost about 25 percent of their body mass index after their surgery, some of their genes remained out of whack. This suggests some fat tissue didn’t recover from obesity—certain genes controlling metabolic function and inflammation remained abnormally switched on or off, for example, von Meyenn explains.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Previous studies showed that fat cells in obese mice also retain epigenetic alterations even after the animals slim down. When they were later fed a high-fat diet, these mice regained weight faster than control animals. Lab tests showed fat cells from the obese mice absorbed glucose and lipids more readily. Fat cells normally take in sugars and lipids, von Meyenn says, but these obesity-altered cells appeared “slightly tweaked” to absorb more of those nutrients.

Other research groups have demonstrated that immune cells might also remember prior weight. When a person gains weight, different types of immune cells infiltrate expanding fat tissue, likely as a stress response, explains William Scott, an obesity researcher at Imperial College London. His research showed that, after bariatric surgery, the number of immune cells in people’s fat tissue decreased dramatically, but not everything completely reset. The immune cells retained the inflammatory characteristics that developed when the people had obesity.

Research in mice has echoed this finding; even after weight loss, macrophages retain epigenetic changes that keep inflammatory genes more active than usual. Another mouse study shows that weight cycling—losing and regaining weight—can intensify these immune cell changes and worsen metabolic health more than never losing the weight.

How long this epigenetic memory lasts isn’t clear, but fat cells can persist for up to a decade in humans, giving those cells the potential to maintain changes long-term, von Meyenn says. And fat may not be the only tissue involved. “I believe there are changes happening in the brain, in the liver, in the muscle,” says von Meyenn, who plans to investigate these areas next.

These findings don’t mean weight loss is futile; even short-term weight loss correlates with improvements in metabolic health. But the research might help explain why weight relapse is so common and why avoiding weight gain matters. In an environment and society that make weight gain prevalent, prevention is much easier said than done, von Meyenn says. Researchers, including von Meyenn, are now exploring whether fat cells can be treated to rewrite these epigenetic changes to make weight loss more sustainable and whether different types of weight-loss intervention have different effects on these cells.

“There’s a big drive to make our weight-loss drugs [such as GLP-1 medications] more potent” to cause greater weight reductions, Scott says, “but we really need to do better at maintaining weight loss once it’s happening.”

Lori Youmshajekian is a science journalist who reports on consumer health, environmental issues and scientific misconduct. She holds a master’s degree in science journalism from New York University and has written for National Geographic, Wired and Retraction Watch, among other outlets.

More by Lori Youmshajekian

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe