New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Child’s Play: Learning Like Infants May Boost Artificial Intelligence

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Once they “understand” a topic or game completely, computers can calculate solutions with stunning speed, far faster than the wetware in our skulls. AlphaGo Zero, from British company DeepMind, accumulated experience by competing against itself millions of times to master the game Go and now exceeds the skills of the game's human experts. That's a remarkable achievement over the first version, AlphaGo, which had mined the data from numerous games played by people. But it was a limited accomplishment nonetheless, given that even the ancient game of Go has clear, finite rules.

Babies, in contrast, rapidly adapt and learn how to manage in surroundings that are continuously changing and where the criteria for success in any endeavor (even for adults) are hardly ever clear. Their brains make predictions about what will happen in a situation, from patting a puppy to fitting a piece in a jigsaw puzzle. Then they experiment with their bodies and with objects, observing and analyzing the world around them. Millions of years of evolution have led to a superior learning system—one that today's roboticists hope to deploy to improve machines controlled by AI, or artificial intelligence. In our cover story, “Self-Taught Robots,” journalist Diana Kwon explores how programming algorithms to learn like children is both transforming robotics and providing some insights into child development. Read on to see what robotic “children” are teaching us adults.

It's common to think of backup files for your laptop, but how about for pollinators? In “Building a Backup Bee,” author Paige Embry writes about how the world's largest almond grower is developing a replacement for honeybees called the blue orchard bee, or BOB. Honeybees have experienced devastating losses in recent years, having been victims of pests, disease, poor nutrition, pesticide exposure and the stresses of literally being trucked around to service different crops as they bloom. Unlike social honeybees, BOBs are solitary—and amazingly efficient. Assuming the challenges of making these insects into managed pollinators can be surmounted, a few hundred BOBs can do the work of 10,000 honeybees.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Further adventures at the frontiers of science await: Read “The Baddest Bite,” by Gregory M. Erickson, for the secrets of the crocodiles and their relatives' evolutionary success. John Gabrieli provides “A Look Within” at imaging technologies that could find the best treatments for depression and addiction in our brains. “Island of Heavyweights,” by Christoph E. Düllmann and Michael Block, describes the race to find the world's heaviest elements—and the “island of stability” in chemistry, where novel elements could last for minutes or even years. We hope you enjoy the journey.

Mariette DiChristina, Steering Group chair, is dean and professor of the practice in journalism at the Boston University College of Communication. She was formerly editor in chief of Scientific American and executive vice president, Magazines, for Springer Nature.

More by Mariette DiChristina
Scientific American Magazine Vol 318 Issue 3This article was published with the title “Child's Play” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 318 No. 3 (), p. 4
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0318-4

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe