New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

China’s Stranded Astronauts Are Safe—For Now. But How Will They Get Home?

There are six people living on the Chinese space station Tiangong at the moment, and the plan to bring three of them back is in progress

Three Chinese astronauts wave in front of a crowd of public onlookers and space agency officials.

From left to right: Wang Jie, Chen Zhongrui and Chen Dong, astronauts for China’s Shenzhou 20 space mission, wave during a departure ceremony before boarding a bus to take them to their spacecraft at the Jiuquan Satellite Launch Center in the Gobi Desert in northwestern China on April 24, 2025.

Pedro Pardo/AFP via Getty Images

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

China is preparing to rescue three astronauts who took refuge in the Tiangong space station after a suspected space-junk strike on their spacecraft last week, Chinese officials said on Tuesday.

In a statement, the China Manned Space Engineering Office (CMSE) said engineers have carried out extensive tests on a backup capsule that they plan to use to bring the three men back to Earth.

“All work is progressing steadily and orderly according to plan,” the agency said.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


China’s Tiangong, which spans some 180 feet, typically hosts a crew of three astronauts in six-month stints. A new three-person crew arrived at the space station to take over from the stranded astronauts in October.

But because of the space debris emergency, both crews remain onboard. While unusual, the station is designed to support two crews in orbit simultaneously, CMSE said.

“The Shenzhou-20 astronaut crew is working and living normally and is conducting in-orbit scientific experiments together with the Shenzhou-21 astronaut crew,” the agency said.

“It’s probably a bit crowded,” says Jonathan McDowell, an astronomer at the Center for Astrophysics | Harvard & Smithsonian. “It’s cramped, but it’s big enough for them to float around in.”

McDowell adds that Chinese officials have been vague about the debris that allegedly struck the Shenzhou 20 spacecraft and the extent of the damage. “That’s frustrating,” he says. “Is it a small hole, a big hole? Is it a pressure drop? Is it a visible scar on the spacecraft? We don’t know.”

The Shenzhou 21 spacecraft could be used to bring the Shenzhou 20 crew home. But if that happens, the Shenzhou 21 crew may be left without a return vehicle for some time. McDowell says China will likely launch a new craft to collect the astronauts instead. “They wouldn’t let anybody on the space station without a ride home,” he adds.

Humberto Basilio is a Mexican science journalist covering policy, health, misconduct, archaeology and the environment. He is also a former news intern at Scientific American. His work has been published in the New York Times, National Geographic, Science, Nature, and more.

More by Humberto Basilio

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe