New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Clues to the Mind Emerge When Perception and Reality Conflict

You are more than a robot searching for food and mates

SANDRO DEL PRETE

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Is not this whole world an illusion? And yet it fools everybody.

—Angela Carter, English novelist (1940–1992)

We are our nervous system. Our brain “drives” our body in an evolutionary quest for food and mates. If you could remove parts of your nervous system one by one, what minimal set would need to remain for you to still be you? Quadriplegic patients don't lose consciousness or emotions, despite spinal cord damage interrupting the brain signals to their limbs and torso. Your spinal column is not critical to who you are. Brain damage from stroke or trauma can cause the inability to see, hear or smell, but these sensory deficits do not affect our fundamental sense of self.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


If you took a neuron, put it in a dish and nourished it (as many neuroscientists, including us, have done), you would find that it hums along and lives its life just fine as long as the environmental conditions remain favorable. It will even form circuits, connecting with other neurons you stick in the dish. Drop in some glutamate, the most common neurotransmitter in the brain, and the neuron will excitedly fire off a volley of impulses. But did it intend to fire? Did it consciously decide to express its delight, like a tiny gourmand tasting a delicacy by its favorite chef? Or did the neuron act as any inanimate machine might, like a heliotropic blade of grass following the sun across the sky?

Let's put that neuron back in the brainpan, which, by the way, is just a dish that will nourish it and keep the conditions favorable. That cell will form specific connections and microcircuits that somehow result in conscious feeling. Those circuits are now animate, just like those underlying the first-person experience of your life. How can that be?

The answer is that we don't know. Sorry, but this is what research is about: if we knew the answer, we would be historians rather than scientists. What we do know is that everything you have ever seen, heard, felt or thought was experienced by neurons in your brain, which is a natural miracle in and of itself. Neurons gather information from your senses, intellect and memory and so create a grand simulation of the world around you, forming the basis of your entire subjective universe. How neural circuits create conscious awareness from insentient neurons is perhaps the most important question in science. So how do we answer it?

When we experience an illusion, our perception fails to match the physical reality. This key dissociation makes illusions a powerful tool to isolate the critical brain areas that give rise to our sentience. It allows scientists like us to discriminate among the neural circuits processing information about reality versus our perception of that reality. Neuronal responses that correlate to the physical reality of an object (such as its physical luminance) and not to our perception of it (such as its illusory brightness) cannot be responsible for our conscious experience. The best way to figure out how our brain constructs our experience of the universe is, ironically, by studying illusory perception. In this issue are our best examples of the twisted, bizarre and truly weird illusions that help us understand who we are.

Contributing Authors

  • Leandro L. Di Stasi is a Talentia/Marie Curie Fellow at the University of Granada in Spain. He works in the emerging field of neuroergonomics

  • Ellis C. Gayles is a U.S. Navy Aerospace physiologist who has trained naval and marine corps aircrew in the aeromedical aspects of flight, performance enhancement and mishap and in combat-survival techniques.

Susana Martinez-Conde is a professor of ophthalmology, neurology, and physiology and pharmacology at SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University in Brooklyn, N.Y. She is author of the Prisma Prize–winning Sleights of Mind, along with Stephen Macknik and Sandra Blakeslee, and of Champions of Illusion, along with Stephen Macknik.

More by Susana Martinez-Conde

Stephen L. Macknik is a professor of opthalmology, neurology, and physiology and pharmacology at SUNY Downstate Medical Center in Brooklyn, N.Y. Along with Susana Martinez-Conde and Sandra Blakeslee, he is author of the Prisma Prize-winning Sleights of Mind. Their forthcoming book, Champions of Illusion, will be published by Scientific American/Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

More by Stephen L. Macknik
SA Special Editions Vol 25 Issue 3sThis article was published with the title “What It Means to Be You” in SA Special Editions Vol. 25 No. 3s (), p. 4
doi:10.1038/scientificamericanillusions0816-4

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe