New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Colin Carlson

Explaining how climate change affects ecological diversity and human health

Stylized illustration portrait of Colin Carlson by Jessine Hein.

Jessine Hein

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

A hangover inspired Colin Carlson to meld climate change, public health and ecology. After a night out with a parasitologist, Carlson sat at brunch asking that friend whether parasites could—like so many of the organisms he worked with—go extinct from climate change. The two went on to conduct the largest study to date of parasite biodiversity, finding that up to one third of parasite species are at risk of extinction caused by climate change. Parasites fill important niches in ecosystems around the world, so the consequences of such a die-off could be catastrophic.

Carlson is now an assistant professor of epidemiology at Yale University, exploring the science and policy behind planetary health and running a National Science Foundation research project called Verena, in which he and his colleagues look for emerging viral threats. His mission is to help the world understand what future public health emergencies will look like and what we can do to mitigate them. He has testified in front of Congress on public health issues and advocated for increased investment in disease surveillance. The challenge, he says, is getting the people in power to act.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Portrait photograph of Colin Carlson by Tony Luong.

Tony Luong

In a time of funding cuts, misinformation and public distrust of science, it’s a more formidable challenge than ever. At the moment Verena is in a “state of profound instability,” with departing staff members, concerns about censorship and uncertainty over lost federal funding. In his laboratory, Carlson keeps a Post-it note on his desk that says, “Time spent on research is never wasted.” He lives by it. “This is the hardest this job has ever been, and I say that kind of tongue in cheek because this job is hard,” Carlson says. “It is normally hard but rewarding. Right now it is mostly hard.”

This article is part of The Young American Scientists, an editorially independent project that was produced with financial support from Regeneron. Special thanks to the Museum of Science in Boston, where Carlson's portrait and video interview were captured.

K. R. Callaway is a freelance journalist and was an editorial intern at Scientific American. She specializes in science, health, history and policy.

More by K. R. Callaway
Scientific American Magazine Vol 335 Issue 1This article was published with the title “Colin Carlson” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 335 No. 1 (), p. 39
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican072026-3PmT6h8KTZeE27gRj2HK86

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe