New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Colombia will euthanize Pablo Escobar’s invasive ‘cocaine hippos’

After attempts at relocation and sterilization have failed, invasive hippos introduced by the infamous drug lord will be culled, the country announced

The heads of two hippos sticking out of the water, their mouths open towards each other

Hippos that are descendants of the ones introduced by drug kingpin Pablo Escobar are seen in the wild in a lake near the Hacienda Napoles theme park, once the private zoo of Escobar, in Doradal, Antioquia Department, Colombia, in 2023.

RAUL ARBOLEDA/AFP via Getty Images

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

After two years of failed attempts at relocation and sterilization, Colombia’s government has decided it will euthanize 80 of the at least 169 “cocaine hippos” that were once owned by notorious drug trafficker Pablo Escobar. The decision is triggering divided reactions among scientists and activists.

“Without this action it is impossible to control them,” said Colombia’s environment minister Irene Vélez at a press conference on Monday. Citing estimates that the population could reach at least 500 individuals by 2030, “affecting our ecosystems and native species,” she added that “it is our responsibility to take this action.”

Escobar illegally introduced four hippos (Hippopotamus amphibius) to one of his estates in the Antioquia region of Colombia in 1981. After his capture and death in 1993, the animals escaped and began reproducing in the wild, where they became a highly threatening invasive predator to native species. The animals’ large size also alters river systems and pollutes the water with waste, depleting its oxygen and overloading it with nutrients. This can kill fish and plants and affect communities that depend on these waterways. Hippos have also caused traffic accidents and attacked people and boats in recent years.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


In 2022 the government launched a sterilization program to slow reproduction of the hippos, which could number up to 200 individuals. At the same time, officials opened talks with seven countries and two international zoo and aquarium associations to relocate the animals. To date, no country has agreed to take even a single hippo, according to the Colombian government, which ultimately led its Ministry of Environment to opt for euthanasia. The ministry did not reply to a request for comment.

Widespread sterilization is not a viable option because it is a “cumbersome, costly and dangerous procedure that progresses at a very slow pace,” says Jorge Moreno Bernal, a Ph.D. candidate at the University of the North in Barranquilla, Colombia. A single sterilization requires cranes and puts human lives at risk, he says. “It is not like sterilizing a dog or a cat.”

In 2023 a study estimated that sterilization and relocation could cost at least $1 million to $2 million just to slow population growth enough to make long-term eradication feasible. Even then, hippos could remain on the landscape for another 50 to 100 years.

The new plan allocates around $2 million for chemical and physical euthanasia, and the government will implement a monitoring plan to identify which animals should be euthanized based on their size and proximity to human populations. At the same time, officials will continue efforts to sterilize the remaining population and seek relocation options within Colombia.

“The ideal scenario would be that no animals die,” says environmental law professor Luis Domingo Gómez Maldonado of the Cooperative University of Colombia. “But the reality is that, at this point, there is no other option.”

Moreno Bernal says the main reason governments did not act more forcefully in the past was because animal rights groups and activists led political campaigns against euthanizing the animals. “No one wanted to be the politician who ordered the killing of hippos,” he says. “That only caused the problem to worsen over time.” But over the past decade, there has been a major scientific awareness campaign about the risks and effects of hippos in the country, and it has led to broader public acceptance of the new measure.

Humberto Basilio is a Mexican science journalist covering policy, health, misconduct, archaeology and the environment. He is also a former news intern at Scientific American. His work has been published in the New York Times, National Geographic, Science, Nature, and more.

More by Humberto Basilio

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe