New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Common Chemicals Linked to Early Menopause

Endocrine disruptors increased likelihood of hormonal change in study of 1,400 women

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Fifteen chemicals that disrupt our endocrine hormonal systems have been linked to earlier menopause among US womenAmber Cooper from Washington University in St Louis, US, and colleagues found women aged 45 to 55 exposed to the organic compounds were up to six times more likely to be menopausal than unexposed peers.

The substances include long-banned but persistent polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and pesticide residues. However, two derive from a shorter-lived phthalate plasticiser, which makes polymer products more pliable and is still in use. ‘Higher everyday exposure levels were associated with menopause coming, on average, two to four years earlier,’ says Cooper. ‘Smoking is thought to be associated with menopause coming one to one and a half years earlier, so it’s a pretty significant association—but this is not a study that can prove causation.’

The researchers exploited data collected by the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) from people across the US from 1999-2008, including women’s age at their last menstrual cycle. Cooper’s team could therefore consider hundreds of menopausal women in whom NHANES scientists had measured at least one potential endocrine disruptor chemical (EDC) by gas or liquid chromatography-mass spectroscopy.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Cooper’s team focused on 28 long-lived chemicals and 12 phthalates thought to harm reproduction. They first hunted for differences between average menopausal age among women whose blood or urine had concentrations in the highest 10% recorded and those with lower concentrations. Two further ‘dose-response’ analyses tracked EDC concentration’s effect on menopausal age across the whole group. Fifteen EDCs had a statistically significant effect in at least one of these three measures. Finally, comparing all women aged 45-55 with exposure data—bracketing the average US woman’s menopausal age at 51—gave odds of being menopausal as EDC levels increased.

Mono-(2-ethyl-5-hydroxyhexyl) phthalate and mono-(2-ethyl-5-oxohexyl) phthalate registered the strongest associations. These compounds are both biomarkers for human exposure to the plasticiser di-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP), set to be banned under EU Reach regulations this month. Several PCBs, the pesticide Mirex and β-hexachlorocyclohexane, a by-product of the pesticide Lindane, were also strongly linked to earlier menopause.

Jessica Tyrrell from the University of Exeter, UK, who previously found an income-chemical exposure link in NHANES data, notes that the many similar associations support the study’s validity. ‘It is definitely interesting, but would certainly need replicating,’ she adds. Cooper agrees. ‘The most important thing this study can do is promote future research to tease out true causative effects,’ she says.

This article is reproduced with permission from Chemistry World. The article was first published on February 3, 2015.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe